Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293094›Full record

ReviewHIV medicine2022

Opening the door on entry inhibitors in HIV: Redefining the use of entry inhibitors in heavily treatment experienced and treatment-limited individuals living with HIV.

Chloe Orkin, Pedro Cahn, Antonella Castagna, Brinda Emu, P Richard Harrigan, Daniel R Kuritzkes, Mark Nelson, Jonathan Schapiro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HIV medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Combined Use of Ibalizumab and Lenacapavir for the Treatment of Multidrug-resistant HIV-1: A Case Series.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Stabilized trimeric peptide immunogens of the complete HIV-1 gp41 N-heptad repeat and their use as HIV-1 vaccine candidates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe OrkinQueen Mary University London, London, UK.
Pedro CahnFundacion Huesped, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Antonella CastagnaVita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Brinda EmuYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
P Richard HarriganUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Daniel R KuritzkesBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Mark NelsonChelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
Jonathan SchapiroSheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEntry inhibitors are a relatively new class of antiretroviral therapy and are typically indicated in heavily treatment experienced individuals living with HIV. Despite this, there is no formal definition of 'heavily treatment experienced'. Interpretation of this term generally includes acknowledgement of multidrug resistance and reflects the fact that patients in need of further treatment options may have experienced multiple lines of therapy. However, it fails to recognize treatment limiting factors including contraindications, age-associated comorbidities, and difficulty adhering to regimens.

methodsThis manuscript follows a roundtable discussion and aims to identify the unmet needs of those living with HIV who are in need of further treatment options, to broaden the definition of heavily treatment experienced and to clarify the use of newer agents, with an emphasis on the potential role of entry inhibitors, in this population. RESULTS/

conclusionsWithin the entry inhibitor class, mechanisms of action differ between agents; resistance to one subclass does not confer resistance to others. Combinations of entry inhibitors should be considered in the same regimen, and if lack of response is seen to one entry inhibitor another can be tried. When selecting an entry inhibitor, physicians should account for patient preferences and needs as well as agent-specific clinical characteristics. Absence of documented multidrug resistance should not exclude an individual from treatment with an entry inhibitor; entry inhibitors are a valuable treatment option for all individuals who are treatment limited or treatment exhausted. We should advocate for additional clinical trials that help define the role of entry inhibitors in people with exhausted/limited ART options other than drug resistance.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsDrug Resistance, ViralHumansAnti-HIV Agentsentry inhibitorheavily treatment experiencedmultidrug resistancetreatment exhaustedtreatment limited

Identifiers

PMID35293094
PMCPMC9546304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.