Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35293030›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association2022

Safety and efficacy of apalutamide in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy: Final report for the Japanese subpopulation analysis of the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III TITAN study.

Hirotsugu Uemura, Gaku Arai, Hiroji Uemura, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Junya Aoyama, Tomoyoshi Hatayama, Miku Ito, Florence Lefresne, Sharon McCarthy, Suneel Mundle and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Oligometastatic carcinoma prostate - An overview of the last decade.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hirotsugu UemuraDepartment of Urology, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3665-9523
Gaku AraiDepartment of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan.
Hiroji UemuraDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.
Hiroyoshi SuzukiDepartment of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Sakura, Chiba, Japan.
Junya AoyamaJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0000-0647
Tomoyoshi HatayamaJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4384-5148
Miku ItoJanssen Pharmaceutical K.K., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-1360
Florence LefresneJanssen Research and Development, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Sharon McCarthyJanssen Research and Development US, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Suneel MundleJanssen Research and Development US, Raritan, New Jersey, USA.
Jin HeJanssen Asia Pacific, Medical Affairs, Singapore.
Kim N ChiBC Cancer and Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Janssen (United States) · USYokohama City University Medical Center · JPJanssen (Belgium) · BEToho University · JPPrevention of Organ Failure · CA

Funding

Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.Janssen Research & Development, LLCJPKK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe TITAN study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial that evaluated apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. At the first interim analysis in the Japanese subpopulation (median follow-up 25.7 months), there was an improvement in overall survival and radiological progression-free survival with apalutamide versus placebo. Here, we report the final analysis results for the Japanese subpopulation.

methodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to receive apalutamide 240 mg or placebo. After the first interim analysis, protocol treatment was unblinded, and crossover was allowed. Efficacy and safety were evaluated in the preplanned, event-driven final analysis.

resultsFifty-one patients were Japanese (apalutamide n = 28; placebo n = 23). After a median follow-up of 46.0 months, the median overall survival was not reached neither in the apalutamide nor the placebo group; the hazard ratio was 0.45, favoring apalutamide, which was consistent with the overall population. Hazard ratios for time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (0.39), time to pain progression (0.87), and time to chronic opioid use (0.82) also favored apalutamide and were comparable with those of the overall population. Time to prostate-specific antigen progression and progression-free survival 2, respectively, was favored in the apalutamide group (0.21 and 0.44). Apalutamide was associated with higher incidences of rash and fracture in the Japanese subpopulation compared with the overall population.

conclusionsThe efficacy of apalutamide with androgen deprivation therapy in Japanese patients was consistent with efficacy demonstrated in the overall population. No new safety concerns emerged with long-term follow-up.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAndrogensCastrationDouble-Blind MethodHumansJapanMaleThiohydantoinsAndrogen AntagonistsAndrogensapalutamideThiohydantoinsandrogen deprivation therapyapalutamideJapanmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID35293030
PMCPMC9310605
OpenAlexW4220959221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.