ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cesarean delivery on maternal request and Robson classification.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Assessing Postpartum Readmission Rates and Associated Risk Factors Using the Robson Classification: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Labour induction and adverse perinatal outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- An obstetric toolbox: Important to maintain, to share, and to evaluate.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Reaching caesarean section rates below 15%: experience of a French tertiary maternity using the Robson classification system.Reproductive health · 2025Observational
- Using linked data to explore medical complications associated with Robson classification of cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2018.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Reducing caesarean section rates in Robson groups 1 and 3: a quality improvement initiative in a private Brazilian hospital.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Implementing the Robson Classification for caesarean sections in Pakistan: experience, challenges, and lessons learned.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Review
- If the first child is breech, overall outcomes for families with two children are similar regardless of the mode of the first birth.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- In-Depth Analysis of Caesarean Section Rate in the Largest Secondary Care-Level Maternity Hospital in Latvia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Towards safer childbirth: a journey of a thousand miles.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Including outcomes other than cesarean section: An innovative perspective on Robson Classification.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Caesarean Deliveries in Internally Displaced Parturients at a Tertiary Hospital in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Five-Year Robson-Based Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Robson Ten Group Classification System is widely used for the audit of cesarean section (CS) rates. However, CS rate alone is a poor quality indicator and should be balanced with other obstetric endpoints. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether Swedish national data on obstetric outcomes other than CS, stratified by the Robson classification, could be analyzed in a useful way. MATERIAL AND
methodsAll births in Sweden from 2017 through 2020 recorded in the nationwide Swedish Pregnancy Register were categorized using the Robson classification with subdivision of some groups. Five outcomes were explored: CS, operative vaginal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and Apgar score <7 at 5 minuteutes. Rates of each outcome and contribution of each group to the total outcome rate were calculated.
resultsThe largest Robson groups were nulliparous and multiparous women with single-term cephalic pregnancies, unscarred uterus and spontaneous labor. Intrapartum CS rates were highest for multiple pregnancies, women with induced labor after previous CS, and nulliparous women with induced labor. Nulliparous women and multiparous women with a previous CS with attempted vaginal birth had the highest operative vaginal delivery and OASIS rates. The postpartum hemorrhage rate was highest for multiple pregnancies and transverse lie, followed by prelabor CS in nulliparous and multiparous women with single-term cephalic pregnancies and unscarred uterus. The highest rates of Apgar score <7 at 5 minute were observed in preterm deliveries, multiple pregnancies, transverse lie and breech presentation. The largest contribution to the total CS rate was made by women with previous CS delivered by prelabor CS, and nulliparous women with induced or spontaneous labor. The largest contribution to all other outcomes was made by nulliparous women with spontaneous or induced labor and, notably, multiparous women with spontaneous labor and unscarred uterus.
conclusionsThe Robson classification provides a useful framework for analyzing CS rates along with rates of operative vaginal delivery, OASIS, postpartum hemorrhage and low Apgar score. Parallel interpretation of several outcomes allows a systematic and multidimensional audit, helpful for families and healthcare professionals, and can be used for comparisons, assessment of trends and subpopulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.