Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292916›Full record

ReviewFolia microbiologica2022

DNA dyes: toxicity, remediation strategies and alternatives.

Abhrajit Debroy, Mohini Yadav, Radhika Dhawan, Shubhankhi Dey, Nancy George

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Folia microbiologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abhrajit DebroyUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Mohini YadavUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Radhika DhawanUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Shubhankhi DeyUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Nancy GeorgeUniversity Institute of Biotechnology, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India. nancy.george@cumail.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9999-2729
Chandigarh University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Release of untreated effluent from processing or manufacturing industries and other commercial premises into water bodies is a major threat to environment and human health. In this regard, the effluent generated from laboratories and other research facilities is of great concern. Among other harmful chemicals, the effluent is rich in toxic organic dyes, which get exposed to the environment and pose serious health risk. The dyes used in nucleic acid analysis specially the DNA dyes are known for their teratogenicity and mutagenic potential, which mainly depends upon the organism and circumstances under which it is exposed. Among animals and humans, exposure to theses dyes may lead to irritation in mouth, eyes and respiratory tract and many other possible effects which are yet to be explored. To overcome these problems, dyes present in the effluents from laboratories must be degraded to non-toxic forms. Various strategies have been proposed and investigated for degradation and remediation of contaminated laboratory effluent. As a modern and cost-effective technique, biodegradation using microbes and plants is potentially eco-friendly and sustainable technique for detoxifying these dyes. In this article, we have discussed and reviewed the structure, properties and toxicity profile of prominent nucleic acid dyes, along with the strategies of remediation of laboratory effluents contaminated with these dyes. In addition, we have also discussed the feasibility and limitations of these remediation strategies and identified research gaps that can help researchers to explore more effective solutions to manage this area of great concern. We have also reviewed various less toxic alternatives of these common as safer options of these dyes.

Indexed as

Coloring AgentsNucleic AcidsAnimalsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalDNAColoring AgentsDNANucleic AcidsAlternative DNA dyesDNA dyesDye degradationNucleic acid dyesToxicity

Identifiers

PMID35292916
OpenAlexW4221063553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.