Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292889›Full record

ReviewReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2022

Sex differences in carcinoid syndrome: A gap to be closed.

Rosaria M Ruggeri, Barbara Altieri, Erika Grossrubatcher, Roberto Minotta, Maria Grazia Tarsitano, Virginia Zamponi, Andrea MIsidori, Antongiulio Faggiano, Anna Maria Colao, NIKE Group

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Navigating care: understanding cancer patients' experiences with systemic radionuclide therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosaria M RuggeriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy. rmruggeri@unime.it.
Barbara AltieriDivision of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Erika GrossrubatcherS.C. Endocrinologia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Roberto MinottaDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Maria Grazia TarsitanoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Virginia ZamponiEndocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MIsidoriDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Antongiulio FaggianoEndocrinology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Anna Maria ColaoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Endocrinology Unit, University Federico II, Naples, Italy.
NIKE Group
Sapienza University of Rome · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda · ITUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms and related carcinoid syndrome (CS) has markedly increased over the last decades and women seem to be more at risk than men for developing CS. Nevertheless, very few studies have investigated sex differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of CS. However, as per other tumours, sex might be relevant in influencing tumour localization, delay in diagnosis, clinical outcomes, prognosis and overall survival in CS. The present review was aimed at evaluating sex differences in CS, as they emerge from an extensive search of the recent literature. It emerged that CS occurs more frequently in female than in male patients with NENs and women seem to have a better prognosis and a slight advantage in overall survival and response to therapy. Moreover, the disease likely impacts differently the quality of life of men and women, with different psychological and social consequences. Nevertheless, sex differences, even if partially known, are deeply underestimated in clinical practice and data from clinical trials are lacking. There is urgent need to increase our understanding of the sex-related differences of CS, in order to define tailored strategies of management of the disease, improving both the quality of life and the prognosis of affected patients.

Indexed as

Malignant Carcinoid SyndromeNeuroendocrine TumorsFemaleHumansMalePrognosisQuality of LifeSex CharacteristicsCarcinoid syndromeEpidemiologyGender differenceNeuroendocrine tumoursSerotonin pathwaySex

Identifiers

PMID35292889
OpenAlexW4220874964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.