Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292665›Full record

ReviewNature communications2022

Principles of human movement augmentation and the challenges in making it a reality.

Jonathan Eden, Mario Bräcklein, Jaime Ibáñez, Deren Yusuf Barsakcioglu, Giovanni Di Pino, Dario Farina, Etienne Burdet, Carsten Mehring

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Neural correlates of phantom motor execution: A functional neuroimaging systematic review and meta-analysis.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Mental tasks induce common modulations of oscillations in cortex and spinal cord.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [The supernumerary robotic limbs of brain-computer interface based on asynchronous steady-state visual evoked potential].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan Eden *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0733-265X
Mario Bräcklein *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1537-7495
Jaime IbáñezDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8439-151X
Deren Yusuf BarsakciogluDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.
Giovanni Di PinoNEXT: Neurophysiology and Neuroengineering of Human-Technology Interaction Research Unit, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5046-5816
Dario FarinaDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7883-2697
Etienne Burdet *Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK. e.burdet@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2123-0185
Carsten Mehring *Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8125-5205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Augmenting the body with artificial limbs controlled concurrently to one's natural limbs has long appeared in science fiction, but recent technological and neuroscientific advances have begun to make this possible. By allowing individuals to achieve otherwise impossible actions, movement augmentation could revolutionize medical and industrial applications and profoundly change the way humans interact with the environment. Here, we construct a movement augmentation taxonomy through what is augmented and how it is achieved. With this framework, we analyze augmentation that extends the number of degrees-of-freedom, discuss critical features of effective augmentation such as physiological control signals, sensory feedback and learning as well as application scenarios, and propose a vision for the field.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsFeedback, SensoryHumansLearningMovement

Identifiers

PMID35292665
PMCPMC8924218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.