Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292643›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Electrical modulation of transplanted stem cells improves functional recovery in a rodent model of stroke.

Byeongtaek Oh, Sruthi Santhanam, Matine Azadian, Vishal Swaminathan, Alex G Lee, Kelly W McConnell, Alexa Levinson, Shang Song, Jainith J Patel, Emily E Gardner and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Electrical stimulation promotes longevity and regeneration in a colonial chordate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Organoid Brain-Machine-Interface Devices for Central Nervous System Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Byeongtaek Oh *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Sruthi Santhanam *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Matine Azadian *Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8253-7113
Vishal SwaminathanDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Alex G LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, 94305, USA.
Kelly W McConnellDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6902-3129
Alexa LevinsonDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Shang SongDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8637-5086
Jainith J PatelDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3196-6436
Emily E GardnerDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Paul M GeorgeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. pgeorge1@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1080-098X
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Optimizing Stem Cell-Enhanced Stroke Recovery through a Bioengineered Electrically Conductive Polymer ScaffoldK08NS089976 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEORGE, PAUL · 2015 to 2019
$940k
NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS089976
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide, intensifying the need for effective recovery therapies. Stem cells are a promising stroke therapeutic, but creating ideal conditions for treatment is essential. Here we developed a conductive polymer system for stem cell delivery and electrical modulation in animals. Using this system, electrical modulation of human stem cell transplants improve functional stroke recovery in rodents. Increased endogenous stem cell production corresponds with improved function. Transcriptome analysis identified stanniocalcin 2 (STC2) as one of the genes most significantly upregulated by electrical stimulation. Lentiviral upregulation and downregulation of STC2 in the transplanted stem cells demonstrate that this glycoprotein is an essential mediator in the functional improvements seen with electrical modulation. Moreover, intraventricular administration of recombinant STC2 post-stroke confers functional benefits. In summation, our conductive polymer system enables electrical modulation of stem cells as a potential method to improve recovery and identify important therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

RodentiaStrokeAnimalsRecovery of FunctionStem Cell Transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35292643
PMCPMC8924243
OpenAlexW4220803470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.