Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292500›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Determinants of immunisation dropout among children under the age of 2 in Zambézia province, Mozambique: a community-based participatory research study using Photovoice.

Jocelyn Powelson, Bvudzai Priscilla Magadzire, Abel Draiva, Donna Denno, Abdul Ibraimo, Bonifácia Beleza Lucas Benate, Lídia Carlos Jahar, Zélia Marrune, Baltazar Chilundo, Jalilo Ernesto Chinai and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jocelyn PowelsonResearch, Evidence & Learning, VillageReach, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9935-9122
Bvudzai Priscilla MagadzireHealth Systems, VillageReach, Cape Town, South Africa bvudzai.magadzire@villagereach.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-6233
Abel DraivaMozambique, VillageReach, Quelimane, Mozambique.
Donna DennoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abdul IbraimoMozambique, VillageReach, Maputo, Mozambique.
Bonifácia Beleza Lucas BenateIndependent, Namarroi, Mozambique.
Lídia Carlos JaharIndependent, Gilé, Mozambique.
Zélia MarruneIndependent, Gilé, Mozambique.
Baltazar ChilundoMozambique, VillageReach, Maputo, Mozambique.
Jalilo Ernesto ChinaiZambézia Provincial Directorate of Health, Quelimane, Mozambique.
Michelle EmersonHealth Systems, VillageReach, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kristin Beima-SofieDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Emily LawrenceResearch, Evidence & Learning, VillageReach, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImmunisations are highly impactful, cost-effective public health interventions. However, substantial gaps in complete vaccination coverage persist. We aimed to describe caregivers' immunisation experiences and identify determinants of vaccine dropout.

designWe used a community-based participatory research approach employing Photovoice, SMS (short messaging service) exchanges and in-depth interviews. A team-based approach was used for thematic analysis. The Increasing Vaccination Model guided the analysis and identification of vaccination facilitators and barriers.

settingThis study was conducted in Zambézia province, Mozambique, in Namarroi and Gilé districts, where roughly 19% of children under 2 start but do not complete the recommended vaccination schedule.

participantsParticipants were identified through health facility vaccination records and included caregivers of children aged 25-34 months who were fully vaccinated (n=10) and partially vaccinated (n=22). We also collected data from 12 health workers responsible for delivering immunisations at the selected health facilities.

resultsFour main patterns of barriers leading to dropout emerged: (1) social norms and limited family support place the immunisation burden on mothers; (2) perceived poor quality of health services reduces caregivers' trust in vaccination services; (3) concern about side effects causes vaccine hesitancy; and (4) caregivers hesitate to seek and advocate for vaccination due to power imbalances with health workers. COVID-19 created additional barriers related to social distancing, mask requirements, supply chain challenges and disrupted outreach services. For most caregivers, dropout becomes increasingly likely with compounding barriers. Caregivers of fully-vaccinated children noted facilitators, including accompaniment to health facilities or assistance caring for other children, which enabled them to complete vaccination.

conclusionsOvercoming immunisation barriers requires strengthening health systems, including improving logistics to avert vaccine stockouts and building health worker capacity, including empathic communication with caregivers. Consistent and reliable immunisation outreach services could address access challenges and improve immunisation uptake, particularly in distant communities.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCOVID-19ChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImmunizationMozambiqueVaccinationinternational health servicespaediatric infectious disease & immunisationpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35292500
PMCPMC8928306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.