Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292493›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

RETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) Trial: protocol for a mixed-methods process evaluation using normalisation process theory.

Kathryn A Radford, Christopher McKevitt, Sara Clarke, Katie Powers, Julie Phillips, Kristelle Craven, Caroline Watkins, Amanda Farrin, Jain Holmes, Rachel Cripps and 12 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Kathryn A RadfordCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK Kathryn.radford@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-3180
Christopher McKevittDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sara ClarkeCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5919-4282
Katie PowersCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Julie PhillipsCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Kristelle CravenCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Caroline WatkinsFaculty of Health and Care, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, UK.
Amanda FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jain HolmesCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Rachel CrippsDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Vicki McLellanClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Tracey SachHealth Economics Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Richard BrindleClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ivana HollowayClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Suzanne HartleyClinical Trials Research Unit (CTRU), University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Audrey BowenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4075-1215
Rory J O'ConnorAcademic Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Judith StevensCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Marion WalkerCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
John MurrayCentre for Rehabilitation and Ageing Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Angela ShoneResearch and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
David ClarkeAcademic Unit for Ageing and Stroke Research, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6279-1192

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis mixed-method process evaluation underpinned by normalisation process theory aims to measure fidelity to the intervention, understand the social and structural context in which the intervention is delivered and identify barriers and facilitators to intervention implementation.

settingRETurn to work After stroKE (RETAKE) is a multicentre individual patient randomised controlled trial to determine whether Early Stroke Specialist Vocational Rehabilitation (ESSVR) plus usual care is a clinically and cost-effective therapy to facilitate return to work after stroke, compared with usual care alone. This protocol paper describes the embedded process evaluation. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Intervention training for therapists will be observed and use of remote mentor support reviewed through documentary analysis. Fidelity will be assessed through participant questionnaires and analysis of therapy records, examining frequency, duration and content of ESSVR sessions. To understand the influence of social and structural contexts, the process evaluation will explore therapists' attitudes towards evidence-based practice, competency to deliver the intervention and evaluate potential sources of contamination. Longitudinal case studies incorporating non-participant observations will be conducted with a proportion of intervention and usual care participants. Semistructured interviews with stroke survivors, carers, occupational therapists, mentors, service managers and employers will explore their experiences as RETAKE participants. Analysis of qualitative data will draw on thematic and framework approaches. Quantitative data analysis will include regression models and descriptive statistics. Qualitative and quantitative data will be independently analysed by process evaluation and Clinical Trials Research Unit teams, respectively. Linked data, for example, fidelity and describing usual care will be synthesised by comparing and integrating quantitative descriptive data with the qualitative findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval obtained through the East Midlands-Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 18/EM/0019) and the National Health ServiceResearch Authority. Dissemination via journal publications, stroke conferences, social media and meetings with national Stroke clinical leads. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12464275.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationCaregiversHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReturn to WorkSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsclinical trialsstrokestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID35292493
PMCPMC8928258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.