ArticleCanadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien2022
Exploring the value of the SCHOOLFirst return-to-school resource: Evaluating usability and satisfaction.
Article in Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Concussions: understanding the invisible injury.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Collaboration is key to concussion management in family medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Barriers to and facilitators of return to learning following a sport-related concussion: Perspectives of female secondary school students.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo cocreate an evidence-based resource to enable educators to support students returning to school after concussion; evaluate the usability of and users' satisfaction with the resource; understand the role of the resource in supporting students' return to school; and describe changes in concussion knowledge following a concussion education and training workshop.
designSurvey during a concussion education and training workshop.
settingHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital in Toronto, Ont, and York Region District School Board in Richmond Hill, Ont.
participantsFifty-six educators, of whom 64% were teachers, 11% were school administrators, 23% fulfilled other roles (eg, child and youth worker), and 2% fulfilled unspecified roles.
main outcome measuresThe survey collected demographic information, usability data via the System Usability Scale, and satisfaction data. Thematic analysis was used for open-ended questions.
resultsParticipants reported the resource to be easy to use (69.6%), not complex (62.5%), and most felt confident using this resource (83.9%). Participants indicated they were satisfied with the resource (73.2%) and would use it in the future (87.5%). Some found the resource overwhelming and recommended it be summarized in a reference guide. Participants found the links, videos, and classroom accommodations or academic supports to be helpful.
conclusionSCHOOLFirst is an evidence-based, user-driven resource that was created for educators to support students returning to school following concussion. Educators, health care providers, youth, and families collaborated on developing SCHOOLFirst to improve students' successful return to school following concussion. Educators were satisfied with the resource and saw opportunities to use it to support their students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.