Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292269›Full record

ArticleProgress in neurobiology2022

Cortical connectivity is embedded in resting state at columnar resolution.

Nicholas S Card, Omar A Gharbawie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in neurobiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas S CardSystems Neuroscience Center, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, USA.
Omar A GharbawieDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Systems Neuroscience Center, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, USA. Electronic address: omar@pitt.edu.

Funding

Functional and structural organization of motor areas in non-human primatesR01NS105697 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI EL GHARBAWIE, OMAR · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resting state (RS) fMRI is now widely used for gaining insight into the organization of brain networks. Functional connectivity (FC) inferred from RS-fMRI is typically at macroscale, which is too coarse for much of the detail in cortical architecture. Here, we examined whether imaging RS at higher contrast and resolution could reveal cortical connectivity with columnar granularity. In longitudinal experiments (~1.5 years) in squirrel monkeys, we partitioned sensorimotor cortex using dense microelectrode mapping and then recorded RS with intrinsic signal optical imaging (RS-ISOI, 20 µm/pixel). FC maps were benchmarked against microstimulation-evoked activation and traced anatomical connections. These direct comparisons showed high correspondence in connectivity patterns across methods. The fidelity of FC maps to cortical connections indicates that granular details of network organization are embedded in RS. Thus, for recording RS, the field-of-view and effective resolution achieved with ISOI fills a wide gap between fMRI and invasive approaches (2-photon imaging, electrophysiology). RS-ISOI opens exciting opportunities for high resolution mapping of cortical networks in living animals.

Indexed as

Brain MappingRestAnimalsBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingCortical connectivityFMRIIntrinsic signal optical imagingNon-human primatesResting stateSensorimotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID35292269
PMCPMC9080903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.