Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292041›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

A framework for participatory work environment interventions in home care - success factors and some challenges.

Johanna Persson, Gerd Johansson, Inger Arvidsson, Britt Östlund, Charlotte Holgersson, Roger Persson, Christofer Rydenfält

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johanna PerssonDepartment of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. johanna.persson@design.lth.se.
Gerd JohanssonDepartment of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Inger ArvidssonDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Britt ÖstlundDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Health Systems, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Charlotte HolgerssonDepartment of Industrial Economics and Management, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Roger PerssonDepartment of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Christofer RydenfältDepartment of Design Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2016-07151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHome care is beset with work environment issues and high staff turnover, while research concerned with interventions to improve the work environment is sparse. Few of the existing interventions apply a participative approach, despite this being associated with more positive outcomes and sustainable change. This paper presents a framework, rooted in action research and action learning, for participatory work environment interventions in home care, and demonstrates how this framework has been implemented in four Swedish home care organizations.

methodsThe framework has three phases (pre-intervention, intervention planning and intervention implementation) and consists of cycles of action and reflection in three constellations: a group of researchers, a reference group with labour market organization representatives and home care managers, and intervention work groups in the home care organizations. The work was documented and analysed with focus on the realization of the framework and challenges that were met on the way. The interventions were evaluated using a pre-/post-test questionnaire design.

resultsParts of the framework were successfully implemented. The pre-intervention phase and the intervention planning phase, with intervention work groups, worked well. All four groups identified one intervention relevant to their own context. However, only two of the proposed interventions were fully implemented and evaluated. The high staff and management turnover, and the high rate of organizational changes made it impossible to evaluate the interventions statistically. Yet, data from open-ended questions in the post questionnaire showed that the two implemented interventions were perceived as successful.

conclusionsThe participatory framework, presented in this paper, seems promising for work environment interventions in home care. The framework was designed to reduce the risk of known disturbances affecting the process in unstable organizations. Despite this, it proved challenging to execute the framework, and especially the interventions, due to changes happening at high speed. In the two cases where organizational changes were not dominating, the interventions were implemented successfully. While the prerequisites for participation and successful implementation could be improved somewhat, the main issue, the instability of the organizational context, is hard for researchers or the individual home care units to tackle alone.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesWorkplaceHealth Services ResearchHumansOrganizational InnovationPersonnel TurnoverAction learningAction researchHome careInterventionParticipationSystematic evaluationWork environment

Identifiers

PMID35292041
PMCPMC8923086
OpenAlexW4221030015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.