Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292036›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2022

Enhanced tumor accumulation and therapeutic efficacy of liposomal drugs through over-threshold dosing.

Hui Ao, Zhuo Wang, Likang Lu, Hongwei Ma, Haowen Li, Jingxin Fu, Manzhen Li, Meihua Han, Yifei Guo, Xiangtao Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Acid-triggeredNanoscale advances · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hui AoInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Zhuo WangCollege of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, No. 24, Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, People's Republic of China.
Likang LuInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Hongwei MaCollege of Pharmacy, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, No. 24, Heping Road, Xiangfang District, Harbin, 150040, People's Republic of China.
Haowen LiInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Jingxin FuInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Manzhen LiInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Meihua HanInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Yifei GuoInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
Xiangtao WangInstitute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 151, Malianwa North Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. xtaowang@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-2415
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNHeilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81202766National Natural Science Foundation of China no. U1401223the Program for Guangdong YangFan Introducing Innovative and Entrepreneurial Teams No. 2017YT05S029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost intravenously administered drug-loaded nanoparticles are taken up by liver Kupffer cells, and only a small portion can accumulate at the tumor, resulting in an unsatisfactory therapeutic efficacy and side effects for chemotherapeutic agents. Tumor-targeted drug delivery proves to be the best way to solve this problem; however, the complex synthesis, or surface modification process, together with the astonishing high cost make its clinical translation nearly impossible.

methodsReferring to Ouyang's work and over-threshold dosing theory in general, blank PEGylated liposomes (PEG-Lipo) were prepared and used as tumor delivery enhancers to determine whether they could significantly enhance the tumor accumulation and in vivo antitumor efficacy of co-injected liposomal ACGs (PEG-ACGs-Lipo), a naturally resourced chemotherapeutic. Here, the phospholipid dose was used as an indicator of the number of liposomes particles with similar particle sizes, and the liposomes was labelled with DiR, a near-red fluorescent probe, to trace their in vivo biodistribution. Two mouse models, 4T1-bearing and U87-bearing, were employed for in vivo examination.

resultsPEG-Lipo and PEG-ACGs-Lipo had similar diameters. At a low-threshold dose (12 mg/kg equivalent phospholipids), PEG-Lipo was mainly distributed in the liver rather than in the tumor, with the relative tumor targeting index (RTTI) being ~ 0.38 at 72 h after administration. When over-threshold was administered (50 mg/kg or 80 mg/kg of equivalent phospholipids), a much higher and quicker drug accumulation in tumors and a much lower drug accumulation in the liver were observed, with the RTTI increasing to ~ 0.9. The in vivo antitumor study in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice showed that, compared to PEG-ACGs-Lipo alone (2.25 mg/kg phospholipids), the co-injection of a large dose of blank PEG-Lipo (50 mg/kg of phospholipids) significantly reduced the tumor volume of the mice by 22.6% (P < 0.05) and enhanced the RTTI from 0.41 to 1.34. The intravenous injection of a low drug loading content (LDLC) of liposomal ACGs (the same dose of ACGs at 50 mg/kg of equivalent phospholipids) achieved a similar tumor inhibition rate (TIR) to that of co-injection. In the U87 MG tumor-bearing mouse model, co-injection of the enhancer also significantly promoted the TIR (83.32% vs. 66.80%, P < 0.05) and survival time of PEG-ACGs-Lipo.

conclusionAn over-threshold dosing strategy proved to be a simple and feasible way to enhance the tumor delivery and antitumor efficacy of nanomedicines and was benefited to benefit their clinical result, especially for liposomal drugs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsLiposomesMiceTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsLiposomesAnnonaceous acetogeninsAntitumorLiposomesOver-threshold dosingTumor delivery

Identifiers

PMID35292036
PMCPMC8922779
OpenAlexW4220813682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.