Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35292002›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Exploring perceived risk for COVID-19 and its role in protective behavior and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: a qualitative study after the first wave.

Naomi J Patterson, Valerie A Paz-Soldan, Richard Oberhelman, Lina Moses, Aubrey Madkour, Thomas T Miles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. "Black Is Not Monolithic": Complexities in COVID-19 Vaccine Decision-Making.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Decisions about adopting novel COVID-19 vaccines among White adults in a rural state, USA: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi J PattersonSocial, Behavior and Population Sciences Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA. npatterson@tulane.edu.
Valerie A Paz-SoldanTropical Medicine Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Richard OberhelmanTropical Medicine Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Lina MosesTropical Medicine Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Aubrey MadkourSocial, Behavior and Population Sciences Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Thomas T MilesTropical Medicine Department, Tulane School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

Tulane-Xavier Minority Training in International HealthT37MD001424 · NIMHD · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI OBERHELMAN, RICHARD A, THEALL, KATHERINE P · 2005 to 2022
$3.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD001424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has had severe impacts on morbidity and mortality globally.

methodsThis study was set in rural central Kentucky and included participants recruited from public spaces. Fifteen qualitative interviews about personal experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic were conducted by phone from July 3 to July 24, 2020. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded using a grounded theory approach.

resultsParticipants who perceived COVID-19 to be a severe risk tended to have personal health concerns and therefore reported taking protective measures for themselves. A slightly smaller proportion of participants reported taking measures to protect others (particularly family). A minority of participants had an ambivalent attitude towards the risk and only took measures if required. COVID-19 vaccine acceptability was low with most participants expressing concerns regarding their need for a vaccine, safety of this vaccine, the value of personal rights, or future vaccine supply.

conclusionsMost participants perceived some risk of COVID-19 and took steps to prevent infections in themselves and others. Mandates for mask use in certain locations were additionally useful for those who had an ambivalent attitude towards the risk of illness. There was surprisingly little connection between perceiving COVID-19 risk and a desire for the COVID-19 vaccine. In this setting, vaccine acceptability was low, with vaccine concerns outweighing perceived potential benefits. In conclusion, because the risk was often constructed in terms of worries for themselves and others, the framing of health education materials for protective behaviors in these terms may be effective. Furthermore, future COVID-19 vaccine education should address vaccine knowledge and concerns, such as the need for a vaccine and its safety, and emphasize how a vaccination would reduce their chances of severe disease if they were to get sick.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Protective behaviorVaccine acceptability

Identifiers

PMID35292002
PMCPMC8922059
OpenAlexW4220751758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.