ArticleBMC cancer2022
Recurrent brain metastases: the role of resection of in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting.
Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for brain metastases: a systematic review and pooled analysis of Efficacy/Safety and the role of combination treatments.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Treatment modalities in recurrent brain metastases: a combined institutional and individual patient data meta-analysis of post-recurrence survival and local progression-free survival.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Review
- International Consensus on Severe Lung Cancer-The Second Edition.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- [Patients with brain metastases : The role of neurosurgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Re-resection of brain metastases - outcomes of an institutional cohort study and literature review.BMC cancer · 2025Review
- The role of surgery in recurrent local cerebral metastases: a multi-institutional retrospective analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- The Role of Repeated Surgical Resections for Recurrent Brain Metastases in Older Population.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel radiotherapeutic strategies in the management of brain metastases: Challenging the dogma.Neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Opportunities and Alternatives of Modern Radiation Oncology and Surgery for the Management of Resectable Brain Metastases.Cancers · 2023Review
- Neurosurgical Interventions for Cerebral Metastases of Solid Tumors.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Review
- Hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (HSRS) as a salvage treatment for brain metastases failing prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).Journal of neuro-oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment decision for recurrent symptomatic brain metastases (BM) is challenging with scarce data regarding surgical resection. We therefore evaluated the efficacy of surgery for pretreated, recurrent BM in a comprehensive multidisciplinary treatment setting.
methodsIn a retrospective single center study, patients were analyzed, who underwent surgical resection of recurrent BM between 2007 and 2019. Intracranial event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Maier and Cox regression analysis.
resultsWe included 107 patients with different primary tumor entities and individual previous treatment for BM. Primary tumors comprised non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (37.4%), breast cancer (19.6%), melanoma (13.1%), gastro-intestinal cancer (10.3%) and other, rare entities (19.6%). The number of previous treatments of BM ranged from one to four; the adjuvant treatment modalities comprised: none, focal or whole brain radiotherapy, brachytherapy and radiosurgery. The median pre-operative Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) was 70% (range 40-100) and improved to 80% (range 0-100) after surgery. The complication rate was 26.2% and two patients died during the perioperative period. Sixty-seven (62.6%) patients received postoperative local radio-oncologic and/or systemic therapy. Median postoperative EFS and OS were 7.1 (95%CI 5.8-8.2) and 11.1 (95%CI 8.4-13.6) months, respectively. The clinical status (postoperative KPS ≥ 70 (HR 0.27 95%CI 0.16-0.46; p < 0.001) remained the only independent factor for survival in multivariate analysis.
conclusionsSurgical resection of recurrent BM may improve the clinical status and thus OS but is associated with a high complication rate; therefore a very careful patient selection is crucial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.