Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291958›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2022

Boston cognitive assessment (BOCA) - a comprehensive self-administered smartphone- and computer-based at-home test for longitudinal tracking of cognitive performance.

Andrey Vyshedskiy, Rebecca Netson, Elisabeth Fridberg, Priyanka Jagadeesan, Matthew Arnold, Sophie Barnett, Anjali Gondalia, Victoria Maslova, Lauren de Torres, Simone Ostrovsky and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Validation and convergent validity of the Boston cognitive assessment (BOCA) in an Italian population: a comparative study with the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in Alzheimer's disease spectrum.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andrey VyshedskiyBoston University, 9 Michael Rd., Boston, MA, 02135, USA. vysha@bu.edu.
Rebecca NetsonAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Elisabeth FridbergBoston University, 9 Michael Rd., Boston, MA, 02135, USA.
Priyanka JagadeesanBoston University, 9 Michael Rd., Boston, MA, 02135, USA.
Matthew ArnoldBoston University, 9 Michael Rd., Boston, MA, 02135, USA.
Sophie BarnettAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Anjali GondaliaBoston University, 9 Michael Rd., Boston, MA, 02135, USA.
Victoria MaslovaAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Lauren de TorresAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Simone OstrovskyAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Danijel DurakovicAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Andrei SavchenkoAlzheimer's Light, Miami, FL, USA.
Sienna McNettCenter for Integrative Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, USA.
Mikhail KoganCenter for Integrative Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, USA.
Irene PiryatinskyNeuropsychological Assessment Clinic, Boston, MA, USA.
Dov GoldDepartment of Clinical Psychology, William James College, Newton, MA, USA.
Alzheimer's Association · USBoston University · USGeorge Washington University · USWilliam James College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal cognitive testing is essential for developing novel preventive interventions for dementia and Alzheimer's disease; however, the few available tools have significant practice effect and depend on an external evaluator. We developed a self-administered 10-min at-home test intended for longitudinal cognitive monitoring, Boston Cognitive Assessment or BOCA. The goal of this project was to validate BOCA. BOCA uses randomly selected non-repeating tasks to minimize practice effects. BOCA evaluates eight cognitive domains: 1) Memory/Immediate Recall, 2) Combinatorial Language Comprehension/Prefrontal Synthesis, 3) Visuospatial Reasoning/Mental rotation, 4) Executive function/Clock Test, 5) Attention, 6) Mental math, 7) Orientation, and 8) Memory/Delayed Recall. BOCA was administered to patients with cognitive impairment (n = 50) and age- and education-matched controls (n = 50). Test scores were significantly different between patients and controls (p < 0.001) suggesting good discriminative ability. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.87 implying good internal consistency. BOCA demonstrated strong correlation with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (R = 0.90, p < 0.001). The study revealed strong (R = 0.94, p < 0.001) test-retest reliability of the total BOCA score one week after participants' initial administration. The practice effect tested by daily BOCA administration over 10 days was insignificant (β = 0.03, p = 0.68). The effect of the screen size tested by BOCA administration on a large computer screen and re-administration of the BOCA to the same participant on a smartphone was insignificant (β = 0.82, p = 0.17; positive β indicates greater score on a smartphone). BOCA has the potential to reduce the cost and improve the quality of longitudinal cognitive tracking essential for testing novel interventions designed to reduce or reverse cognitive aging. BOCA is available online gratis at www.bocatest.org .

Indexed as

CognitionSmartphoneHumansNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsCognitionCognitive testingDementiaMild cognitive impairmentTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID35291958
PMCPMC8922721
OpenAlexW4220667742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.