Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291947›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022

Using linear and natural cubic splines, SITAR, and latent trajectory models to characterise nonlinear longitudinal growth trajectories in cohort studies.

Ahmed Elhakeem, Rachael A Hughes, Kate Tilling, Diana L Cousminer, Stefan A Jackowski, Tim J Cole, Alex S F Kwong, Zheyuan Li, Struan F A Grant, Adam D G Baxter-Jones and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Postnatal growth and childhood asthma in preterm and full-term twins: A cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Craniofacial growth percentile curves: A clinical tool from the Craniofacial Growth Consortium Study.American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ahmed ElhakeemMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. a.elhakeem@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7637-6360
Rachael A HughesMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kate TillingMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Diana L CousminerDivision of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stefan A JackowskiCollege of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Tim J ColeUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Alex S F KwongMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Zheyuan LiSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Struan F A GrantDivision of Human Genetics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Adam D G Baxter-JonesCollege of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Babette S ZemelDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Deborah A LawlorMRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council G9815508Medical Research Council MC_PC_15018Medical Research Council MC_PC_19009Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00011/6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLongitudinal data analysis can improve our understanding of the influences on health trajectories across the life-course. There are a variety of statistical models which can be used, and their fitting and interpretation can be complex, particularly where there is a nonlinear trajectory. Our aim was to provide an accessible guide along with applied examples to using four sophisticated modelling procedures for describing nonlinear growth trajectories.

methodsThis expository paper provides an illustrative guide to summarising nonlinear growth trajectories for repeatedly measured continuous outcomes using (i) linear spline and (ii) natural cubic spline linear mixed-effects (LME) models, (iii) Super Imposition by Translation and Rotation (SITAR) nonlinear mixed effects models, and (iv) latent trajectory models. The underlying model for each approach, their similarities and differences, and their advantages and disadvantages are described. Their application and correct interpretation of their results is illustrated by analysing repeated bone mass measures to characterise bone growth patterns and their sex differences in three cohort studies from the UK, USA, and Canada comprising 8500 individuals and 37,000 measurements from ages 5-40 years. Recommendations for choosing a modelling approach are provided along with a discussion and signposting on further modelling extensions for analysing trajectory exposures and outcomes, and multiple cohorts.

resultsLinear and natural cubic spline LME models and SITAR provided similar summary of the mean bone growth trajectory and growth velocity, and the sex differences in growth patterns. Growth velocity (in grams/year) peaked during adolescence, and peaked earlier in females than males e.g., mean age at peak bone mineral content accrual from multicohort SITAR models was 12.2 years in females and 13.9 years in males. Latent trajectory models (with trajectory shapes estimated using a natural cubic spline) identified up to four subgroups of individuals with distinct trajectories throughout adolescence.

conclusionsLME models with linear and natural cubic splines, SITAR, and latent trajectory models are useful for describing nonlinear growth trajectories, and these methods can be adapted for other complex traits. Choice of method depends on the research aims, complexity of the trajectory, and available data. Scripts and synthetic datasets are provided for readers to replicate trajectory modelling and visualisation using the R statistical computing software.

Indexed as

Bone DensityModels, StatisticalAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleRotationYoung AdultALSPACBMDCSBone mineral contentGrowth modelsLife-courseMixed-effectsPBMASTutorial

Identifiers

PMID35291947
PMCPMC8925070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.