ArticleBMC primary care2022
Dermoscopy use in primary care: a qualitative study with general practitioners.
Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ex Vivo Assessment of Keratinocytic Carcinomas Using a Fast Mid-Infrared Probe.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Improving Representation and Knowledge of Dermatological Conditions in Skin of Colour in Undergraduate Dermatology Teaching: An Educational Intervention.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Article
- Training Primary Care Practitioners In Dermoscopy Diagnostic Algorithms Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy and Triage of Suspected Skin Cancer: Scoping Review Evidence.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
- Article
- Improving Melanoma Screening in Primary Care: The Experience of the Association of French General Practitioners Practicing Dermoscopy.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Article
- Australian General practitioners' confidence in dermatology diagnosis and management: cross-sectional survey.Family practice · 2025Article
- Deep Learning Approaches for the Classification of Keloid Images in the Context of Malignant and Benign Skin Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Accuracy of ChatGPT in diagnosis and management of dermoscopic images.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Effect of skin color on optical properties and the implications for medical optical technologies: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Protocol for a systematic review of reviews on training primary care providers in dermoscopy to detect skin cancers.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Improving Skin Cancer Diagnostics Through a Mobile App With a Large Interactive Image Repository: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR dermatology · 2023Article
- Accuracy of a Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Application for Classification of Melanomas, Melanocytic Nevi, and Seborrheic Keratoses.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Melanoma Detection by Non-Specialists: An Untapped Potential for Triage?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Accuracy of Skin Cancer Detection Rates with the Implementation of Dermoscopy Among Dermatology Clinicians: A Scoping Review.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin assessments constitute a significant proportion of consultations with family physicians (commonly called general practitioners or GPs in the UK), and referrals to hospital dermatology departments have risen significantly in recent years. Research has shown that dermoscopy use may help GPs to assess and triage skin lesions, including suspected skin cancers, more accurately. However, dermoscopy is used by a small minority of GPs in the UK. Previous questionnaire studies have aimed to establish in a limited way some perceptions of dermoscopy among GPs: this study aimed to explore more deeply the factors influencing the use of dermoscopy among GPs.
methodsThis was a qualitative interview study set in UK general practice. A purposive sample was taken of GPs who were established dermoscopy users, GPs who had recently adopted dermoscopy, and those who did not use dermoscopy. A total of twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted. Audio-recordings were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic analysis (Braun and Clarke).
resultsGPs' capability to use dermoscopy necessitated receiving adequate training, while previous dermatology experience and support from colleagues were also considered factors that enabled dermoscopy use. The impact of dermoscopy on patient consultations about skin complaints was generally considered to be positive, as was having an 'in-house' dermoscopy user within a GP practice to refer patients to. However, training in dermoscopy was not considered a priority for many GPs either due to other more pressing concerns within their practices or the perceived complexity of dermoscopy, alongside barriers such as equipment costs. Significant ethical concerns with posting patient photographs online for training and teaching purposes were also highlighted.
conclusionsBoth GPs who use dermoscopy, and those who do not, consider it to have an important role in improving skin assessments within primary care. However the need for adequate training in dermoscopy and dermatology more generally was highlighted as a key barrier to its wider use. The development of competency standards for the use of dermoscopy could allow the adequacy of training to be assessed and developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.