Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291935›Full record

ArticleBMC genomic data2022

Profiles of genetic parameters of body weight and feed efficiency in two divergent broiler lines for meat ultimate pH.

Quentin Berger, Elodie Guettier, Jérémy Bernard, Patrice Ganier, Marine Chahnamian, Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval, Sandrine Mignon-Grasteau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomic data, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Quentin BergerINRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Elodie GuettierINRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Jérémy BernardINRAE, PEAT, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Patrice GanierINRAE, PEAT, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Marine ChahnamianINRAE, PEAT, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Elisabeth Le Bihan-DuvalINRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380, Nouzilly, France.
Sandrine Mignon-GrasteauINRAE, Université de Tours, BOA, 37380, Nouzilly, France. sandrine.grasteau@inrae.fr.
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FRUniversité de Tours · FRBiologie des Oiseaux et Aviculture · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelection for feed efficiency is one of the best ways to decrease poultry production costs and environmental impacts. While literature on its genetic determinism is abundant, it is limited to one or a few periodic values over the animals' lifespans. With the development of new phenotyping tools, kinetics of growth and feed intake are now available, providing access to daily data on feed efficiency. In this study, over the course of 6 weeks, we described the kinetics of body weight (BW), average daily weight gain (ADG), feed intake (FI), and daily cumulative feed conversion ratio (DCFCR) using electronic feed stations. We then estimated the genetic parameters of daily data in two fast growing lines of chicken divergently selected for breast meat ultimate pH (heritability and genetic correlations with breast meat yield and pH).

resultsBirds from the line selected to have a more acidic meat (pHu-), were more efficient than those selected to have a less acidic meat (pHu+), with a 4.3% higher BW from d7 to d29 and 5.0% better feed efficiency from d12 to slaughter. The line effect for ADG and DCFCR appeared to be significant as early as d5, which is consistent with the early age at which metabolic differences between the two lines appear. Genetic parameters estimated within each line revealed different genetic determinisms of growth and feed efficiency, with a higher impact of maternal effects on BW during the growing phase (d10 to d20) in the pHu+ line and much higher heritability values of DCFCR during the finishing phase (d26-d42) in the pHu- line.

conclusionGenetic profiles of daily performance highlighted the difference between both lines. Their behavior during dietary transitions reinforced the already known impact of these periods in the animals' lives. Based on the profiles of genetic parameters within each line, it seems feasible to identify early criteria for selecting feed efficiency, but they must be defined for each line, as the genetic determinism of these traits is line-dependent.

Indexed as

ChickensMuscle, SkeletalAnimalsBody WeightHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMeatWeight GainAlternative feedstuffChickenFeed conversion ratioGenetic determinismGrowthKineticsMeat quality

Identifiers

PMID35291935
PMCPMC8925093
OpenAlexW4220662195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.