Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291883›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2022

Group composition of individual personalities alters social network structure in experimental populations of forked fungus beetles.

Phoebe A Cook, Olivia M Baker, Robin A Costello, Vincent A Formica, Edmund D Brodie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Population age structure shapes selection on social behaviour in a long-lived insect.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  2. Ageing in a collective: the impact of ageing individuals on social network structure.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Phoebe A CookDepartment of Biology and Mountain Lake Biological Station, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2108-0057
Olivia M BakerDepartment of Biology and Mountain Lake Biological Station, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.
Robin A CostelloDepartment of Biology and Mountain Lake Biological Station, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4528-2550
Vincent A FormicaDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-5522
Edmund D BrodieDepartment of Biology and Mountain Lake Biological Station, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9231-8347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social network structure is a critical group character that mediates the flow of information, pathogens and resources among individuals in a population, yet little is known about what shapes social structures. In this study, we experimentally tested whether social network structure depends on the personalities of individual group members. Replicate groups of forked fungus beetles (

Indexed as

ColeopteraAnimalsFungiPersonalityPhenotypeSocial BehaviorSocial Networkinganimal personalityforked fungus beetlesgroup compositionsocial networks

Identifiers

PMID35291883
PMCPMC8923822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.