ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020
Co-registration of pre- and post-stent intravascular OCT images for validation of finite element model simulation of stent expansion.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational Analysis of Intravascular OCT Images for Future Clinical Support: A Comprehensive Review.IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Computational simulations of coronary artery bifurcation stenting using realistic plaque distribution and materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Morphology-Based Non-Rigid Registration of Coronary Computed Tomography and Intravascular Images Through Virtual Catheter Path Optimization.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2025Article
- Prediction of stent under-expansion in calcified coronary arteries using machine learning on intravascular optical coherence tomography images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Role of Intracoronary Imaging for the Management of Calcified Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) provides high-resolution images of coronary calcifications and detailed measurements of acute stent deployment following stent implantation. Since pre- and post-stent IVOCT image "pull-back" acquisitions start from different locations, registration of corresponding pullbacks is needed for assessing treatment outcomes. In particular, we are interested in assessing finite element model (FEM) prediction of lumen gain following stenting, requiring registration. We used deep learning to segment calcifications in corresponding pre- and post-stent IVOCT pullbacks. We created 1D representations of calcium thickness as a function of the angle of the helical IVOCT scans. Registration of two scans was done by maximizing the cross correlation of these two 1D representations. Registration was accurate, as determined by visual comparisons of 2D image frames. We used our pre-stent calcification segmentations to create a lesion-specific FEM, which took into account balloon size, balloon pressure, and stent measurements. We then compared simulated lumen gain from FEM analysis to actual stent deployment results. Actual lumen gain across ~200 registered pre and post-stent images was 1.52 ± 0.51, while FEM prediction was 1.43 ± 0.41. Comparison between actual and FEM results showed no significant difference (p < 0.001), suggesting accurate prediction of FEM modeling. Registered image data showed good visual agreement regarding lumen gain and stent strut malapposition. Hence, we have developed a platform for evaluation of FEM prediction of lumen gain. This platform can be used to guide development of FEM prediction software, which could ultimately help physicians with stent treatment planning of calcified lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.