Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291689›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2022

Subconcussive changes in youth football players: objective evidence using brain vital signs and instrumented accelerometers.

Shaun D Fickling, Daniel N Poel, Jason C Dorman, Ryan C N D'Arcy, Thayne A Munce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Brain sciences and the R words.Brain communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaun D FicklingFaculty of Sciences and Applied Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-2660
Daniel N PoelSanford Sports Science Institute, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD 57107, USA.
Jason C DormanSanford Sports Science Institute, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD 57107, USA.
Ryan C N D'ArcyFaculty of Sciences and Applied Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9091-2633
Thayne A MunceSanford Sports Science Institute, Sanford Health, Sioux Falls, SD 57107, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain vital signs, measured by EEG, were used for portable, objective, neurophysiological evaluation of cognitive function in youth tackle football players. Specifically, we investigated whether previously reported pre- and post-season subconcussive changes detected in youth ice hockey players were comparably detected in football. The two objectives were to: (i) replicate previously published results showing subconcussive cognitive deficits; and (ii) the relationship between brain vital sign changes and head-impact exposure. Using a longitudinal design, 15 male football players (age 12.89 ± 0.35 years) were tested pre- and post-season, with none having a concussion diagnosis during the season. Peak latencies and amplitudes were quantified for Auditory sensation (N100), Basic attention (P300) and Cognitive processing (N400). Regression analyses tested the relationships between these brain vital signs and exposure to head impacts through both number of impacts sustained, and total sessions (practices and games) participated. The results demonstrated significant pre/post differences in N400 latencies, with ∼70 ms delay (

Indexed as

concussionEEGERPfootballsubconcussion

Identifiers

PMID35291689
PMCPMC8914875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.