Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291627›Full record

ArticleJournal of human kinetics2022

Effect of Inter-Repetition Rest Vs. Traditional Resistance Training on The Upper Body Strength Rate of Force Development and Triceps Brachii Muscle Architecture.

Nikolaos Zaras, Angeliki-Nikoletta Stasinaki, Thomas Mpampoulis, Polyxeni Spiliopoulou, Marios Hadjicharalambous, Gerasimos Terzis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06131736 (Comparative Effects of High Intensity Interval Training and Cluster Training on Speed, Explosive Strength and Functional Performance in Football Players.), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06131736 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of High Intensity Interval Training and Cluster Training on Speed, Explosive Strength and Functional Performance in Football Players.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled54ConditionsHigh Intensity Interval Training, Functional Performance, Football PlayersArmsTabata Training, Cluster Training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biological Determinants of Track and Field Throwing Performance.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nikolaos ZarasHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia Cyprus.
Angeliki-Nikoletta StasinakiSports Performance Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece.
Thomas MpampoulisSports Performance Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece.
Polyxeni SpiliopoulouSports Performance Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece.
Marios HadjicharalambousHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Life and Health Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia Cyprus.
Gerasimos TerzisSports Performance Laboratory, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of seven-week inter-repetition rest vs. traditional resistance training on upper body maximum strength, the rate of force development and triceps brachii muscle architecture. Sixteen male participants were equally assigned into the inter-repetition rest and the traditional group. In both groups, training included the bench press exercise performed with 4 sets of 6 maximum repetitions, two training sessions per week. Twenty-second inter-repetition rest was employed for the inter-repetition rest group only. Measurements before and after the training period included maximum strength in the bench press, the isometric upper body rate of force development and peak force and triceps brachii muscle architecture. Maximum strength increased significantly in both groups (inter-repetition rest group: 21.5 ± 5.7% vs. traditional group: 13.5 ± 7.2%, p < 0.05), however, the maximum strength percentage increase was greater in the inter-repetition rest group compared to the traditional group (p = 0.027). Upper body isometric peak force increased only after inter-repetition rest training (10.7 ± 10.3%, p = 0.009). The rate of force development remained unchanged for both groups (p > 0.05), although percentage changes in time frames of 0-80 and 0-100 milliseconds were greater for the inter-repetition rest group compared to the traditional training group (p = 0.024 and p = 0.044, respectively). Triceps brachii thickness increased similarly for both groups (p < 0.05). These results suggest that inter-repetition rest may induce greater increases in maximum strength and the rate of force development compared to traditional training during the initial weeks of resistance training.

Indexed as

bench pressresistance trainingupper body power

Identifiers

PMID35291627
PMCPMC8884871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.