Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291553›Full record

ReviewFood & nutrition research2021

The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 - prioritisation of topics for

Anne Høyer, Jacob Juel Christensen, Erik Kristoffer Arnesen, Rikke Andersen, Hanna Eneroth, Maijaliisa Erkkola, Eva Warensjö Lemming, Helle Margrete Meltzer, Þórhallur Ingi Halldórsson, Inga Þórsdóttir and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food & nutrition research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Anne HøyerThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.
Jacob Juel ChristensenNorwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Erik Kristoffer ArnesenThe Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.
Rikke AndersenNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Hanna EnerothThe Swedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Maijaliisa ErkkolaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eva Warensjö LemmingThe Swedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden.
Helle Margrete MeltzerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Þórhallur Ingi HalldórssonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Inga ÞórsdóttirSchool of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Ursula SchwabSchool of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Campus, Kuopio, Finland.
Ellen TrolleNational Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Rune BlomhoffDepartment of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
National Food Administration · SETechnical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Iceland · ISUniversity of Oslo · NONorwegian Directorate of Health · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As part of the process of updating national dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs), the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 project (NNR2022) will select a limited number of topics for systematic reviews (SRs). Objective: To develop and transparently describe the results of a procedure for prioritisation of topics that may be submitted for SRs in the NNR2022 project. Design: In an open call, scientists, health professionals, national food and health authorities, food manufacturers, other stakeholders and the general population in the Nordic and Baltic countries were invited to suggest SR topics. The NNR2022 Committee developed scoping reviews (ScRs) for 51 nutrients and food groups aimed at identifying potential SR topics. These ScRs included the relevant nominations from the open call. SR topics were categorised, ranked and prioritised by the NNR2022 Committee in a modified Delphi process. Existing qualified SRs were identified to omit duplication. Results: A total of 45 nominations with suggestion for more than 200 exposure-outcome pairs were received in the public call. A number of additional topics were identified in ScRs. In order to omit duplication with recently qualified SRs, we defined criteria and identified 76 qualified SRs. The NNR2022 Committee subsequently shortlisted 52 PI/ECOTSS statements, none of which overlapped with the qualified SRs. The PI/ECOTSS statements were then graded 'High' ( Discussion: The selection of topics for Conclusion: The principles and methodologies developed in the NNR2022 project may serve as a framework for national health authorities or organisations when developing national DRVs and FBDGs. This collaboration between the food and health authorities in Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Iceland, Latvia, Lithuania, Norway and Sweden represents an international effort for harmonisation and sharing of resources and competence when developing national DRVs and FBDGs.

Indexed as

dietary reference valuesevidence-based nutritionfood-based dietary guidelinesnational food and health authoritiesNordic countriesnutrient recommendationssystematic reviewsthe Baltics

Identifiers

PMID35291553
PMCPMC8897982
OpenAlexW3207635041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.