ReviewCureus2022
Inpatient Management of Encephalopathy.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Current Challenges in Encephalopathy Documentation and Coding.Advances in health information science and practice · 2025Review
- Two PerPLEXing Cases of Hashimoto's Encephalopathy Unresponsive to Steroid and Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unexplained encephalopathy is a common occurrence in tertiary care centers and neurologic disorders should be considered after ruling out the infectious, toxic and metabolic etiologies. Neuroimaging combined with a thorough history and examination is often helpful in ruling out stroke and fulminant demyelinating encephalopathies. Autoimmune encephalopathy should be suspected in any patient with unexplained acute or subacute onset encephalopathy or rapidly progressing dementia. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) encephalitis is the most studied form and Hashimoto encephalitis is the most controversial form of autoimmune encephalopathies. Obtaining a combined serum and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) autoantibody testing will increase the diagnostic yield of autoimmune and paraneoplastic encephalitis. When diagnosing NMDA receptor antibodies CSF is always more sensitive than serum and in contrast, voltage-gated potassium channel (VGKC) complex antibodies are more readily detectable in serum than in CSF. Neural-specific antibody tests frequently result after several weeks and treatment should be administered without a significant delay to prevent brain damage. Autoimmune encephalitis is often treatment responsive when immunotherapy (glucocorticoids, intravenous immune globulin, plasma exchange) is used in various combinations. The absence of inflammatory markers and autoantibodies in the serum or CSF may not rule out the possibility of paraneoplastic encephalopathies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.