Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291533›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Assessment of Surgical Outcome in Three- and Four-Part Proximal Humerus Fracture Treated With Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Plate Versus Neer's Prosthesis in Elderly Patients.

Sagar Gurnani, Tushar Pisal, Mukesh O Phalak, Tushar Chaudhari, Shivam Patel, Parth Yadav, S K Mizanur

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sagar GurnaniOrthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Tushar PisalOrthopedics and Traumatology, Spine Surgeon, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Mukesh O PhalakOrthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Tushar ChaudhariOrthopaedic Surgery, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Shivam PatelOrthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Parth YadavOrthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
S K MizanurOrthopaedics, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital & Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith an incidence of 50% of humerus fractures, proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) can significantly impact one's quality of life. Moreover, management of highly comminuted or displaced PHFs poses a significant challenge amongst elderly population due to poor bone quality. Prosthetic replacement of humeral head or its stabilization using external plates is a commonly employed intervention for treating three- and four-part PHFs. Thus, these two methods were compared in this study to identify a preferable intervention.

methodsPatients were randomly divided into two groups to receive proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS®, Synthes, Switzerland) plating and Neer's hemiarthroplasty. The deltopectoral approach was deployed as the surgical method. Their surgical outcome was assessed from functional range of motion (ROM) and Constant-Murley scores at regular intervals of three, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks.

resultsTwenty patients were divided into two groups who received PHILOS

conclusionsPrognosis following PHILOS® plate osteosynthesis had a better overall outcome than hemiarthroplasty with Neer's prosthesis. Although hemiarthroplasty yielded a consistent functional outcome, PHILOS® plate osteosynthesis tends to restore a greater ROM. Thus, PHILOS® plating is recommended as the suitable method to manage three- and four-part PHF for people above fifty-five years of age.

Indexed as

constant-murley scoreneer’s prosthesisphilos plateproximal humerus fractureradiological outcome

Identifiers

PMID35291533
PMCPMC8897720
OpenAlexW4210791509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.