ArticleCureus2022
Variation in COVID-19 Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes Between Different ABO Blood Groups.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- ABO blood group and rhesus factor association with inpatient COVID-19 mortality and severity: a two-year retrospective review.Blood research · 2023Article
- ABO blood group and link to COVID-19: A comprehensive review of the reported associations and their possible underlying mechanisms.Microbial pathogenesis · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study was to explore whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and outcomes varied between different ABO blood groups. This retrospective study included 363 COVID-19 confirmed patients who had their blood group recorded in the hospital medical records, from March to June 2020. Data representing demographics, clinical features, vital signs, laboratory findings, and COVID-19 outcomes were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis and the results were adjusted for sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory variables. The patients' mean age was 50 ± 17.8 years. Of the 363 patients, 30% were blood group A, 22.3% were blood group B, 8.8% were blood group AB, and 38.8% were blood group O. Bivariate analysis showed that patients with blood group AB were more likely to be free of any medical disease (65.6%) compared to other blood groups (p = 0.007). Fever was the most common presenting complaint (66.7%), and it did not significantly vary with changes in ABO blood groups (p = 0.230). Regarding laboratory characteristics, only C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly associated with the blood groups, with high levels seen in blood groups A, B, and O (p = 0.036). In multivariate analysis, variations in emergency department (ED) disposition, requirement of intensive care unit care, and requirement of mechanical ventilation were not statistically significant among the different ABO blood groups. Furthermore, no correlation was found between hospital death and the different ABO blood groups. In conclusion, COVID-19 is most prevalent among patients with blood group O and least prevalent among those with blood group AB. No particular blood group had worse COVID-19 disease severity and outcomes than other blood groups. Therefore, we believe that ABO blood grouping should not be used as a major assessment tool for COVID-19 disease severity and outcome, and other known risk factors should be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.