ArticlePeerJ2022
Functional analysis of
Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Driven Functional Validation ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Multi-omics analysis of organ-specific hormone distribution and molecular regulatory mechanisms inFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- The Physiological Response Mechanism of Peanut Leaves under Al Stress.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- AtSNP_TATAdb: Candidate Molecular Markers of Plant Advantages Related to Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms within Proximal Promoters ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Effects of histone methylation modification on low temperature seed germination and growth of maize.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Diverse Auxin Responses during Plant Growth and Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Advances and prospects of orchid research and industrialization.Horticulture research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: The sequence of the Results: CgARF1 cloned from Conclusion: These results indicated that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.