ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Validity of anaerobic threshold measured in resistance exercise.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-sectional study on exercise capacity in obese patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Characteristics of cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in adults with different degrees of obesity.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Intensity for resistance exercise is estimated based on the maximum muscle strength. Exercise prescription without evaluating the biological response has a challenge. This study aimed to confirm whether anaerobic threshold measured using cardiopulmonary exercise test in resistance exercise is appropriate or not. [Participants and Methods] Resistance exercise adopted for the study was right-leg knee extension. The participants were 10 healthy young males. We investigated whether the oxygen uptake kinetics achieved a steady state within 3 min during the constant-load test with knee extension at 80% anaerobic threshold using cardiopulmonary exercise test with knee extension. If oxygen uptake kinetics achieved a steady state within 3 min, the exercise intensity measured using cardiopulmonary exercise test was considered appropriate. [Results] Anaerobic threshold was measured using the conventional approach in all participants. The steady state of oxygen uptake kinetics could be achieved within 3 min. In the constant-load test with knee extension at 80% anaerobic threshold, the oxygen uptake kinetics achieved a steady state within 3 min. [Conclusion] Based on the findings, the anaerobic threshold obtained using cardiopulmonary exercise test with resistance exercise was judged as appropriate. The results of this study contribute to the accurate setting of exercise load for resistance exercise and condition setting for the evaluation of skeletal muscle function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.