ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2022
Identification of hub genes and pathways in bladder cancer using bioinformatics analysis.
Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chromosomal instability as a predictive biomarker for recurrence risk following transurethral resection of NMIBC.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- ACTC1 promotes tumor progression by upregulating BMP4 expression in prostate cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Identification of ECM and EMT relevant genes involved in the progression of bladder cancer through bioinformatics analysis.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignant tumor of urinary tract system. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic signatures of bladder cancer (BC) and identify its potential molecular mechanisms. The gene expression profiles of GSE3167 (50 samples, including 41BC and 9 non-cancerous urothelial cells) was downloaded from the GEO database. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway (KEGG) were performed to identify enriched pathways, and a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was used to identify hub genes and for module analysis. Moreover, we conducted expression and survival analyses to screen and validate hub genes. In total, 1528 DEGs were identified in bladder cancer (BC), including 1212 up-regulated genes and 316 down-regulated genes. Up-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were significantly enriched in negative regulation of macromolecule metabolic process, macromolecule catabolic process, proteolysis and regulation of cell death, while the down-regulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were mainly involved in cell surface receptor linked signal transduction, ion transport, cell-cell signaling and defense response. The top 10 hub genes with the highest degrees were selected from the PPI network. These genes included HSP90AA1, MYH11, MYL9, CNN1, ACTC1, RAN, ENO1, HNRNPC, ACTG2 and YWHAZ. From sub-networks, we found these genes were involved in the proteasome, pathways in cancer and cell cycle. Hence, the identified DEGs and hub genes may be beneficial to elucidate the mechanisms underlying BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35291419PMC8918393W4226212618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.