Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291299›Full record

ArticleResearch square2022

A novel VOC breath tracer method to evaluate indoor respiratory exposures in the near- and far-fields.

Hooman Parhizkar, Mark Fretz, Aurélie Laguerre, Jason Stenson, Richard L Corsi, Kevin G Van Den Wymelenberg, Elliott T Gall

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hooman ParhizkarInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-9459
Mark FretzInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-3712-9724
Aurélie LaguerreDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-8167-3586
Jason StensonEnergy Studies in Building Laboratories, University of Oregon, Portland, Oregon.
Richard L CorsiCollege of Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-1291-3566
Kevin G Van Den WymelenbergInstitute for Health in the Built Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-5537
Elliott T GallDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID 0000-0003-1351-0547
University of Oregon · USPortland State University · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Reducing Susceptibility to Environmental Stress Throughout the Life SpanP30ES000210 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKMAN, JOSEPH S · 1985 to 2015
$21.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies suggest that far-field transmission (> 6 ft) explains the significant number of COVID-19 superspreading outbreaks. Therefore, quantitative evaluation of near- and far-field exposure to emissions from a source is key to better understanding human-to-human airborne infectious disease transmission and associated risks. In this study, we used an environmentally-controlled chamber to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from a healthy participant who consumed breath mints, which contained unique tracer compounds. Tracer measurements were made at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, 7.5 ft from the participant, as well as in the exhaust plenum of the chamber. We observed that 2.5 ft trials had substantially (~36-44%) higher concentrations than other distances during the first 20 minutes of experiments, highlighting the importance of the near-field relative to the far-field before virus-laden respiratory aerosol plumes are continuously mixed into the far-field. However, for the conditions studied, the concentrations of human-sourced tracers after 20 minutes and approaching the end of the 60-minute trials at 2.5 ft, 5 ft, and 7.5 ft were only ~18%, ~11%, and ~7.5% higher than volume-averaged concentrations, respectively. Our findings highlight the importance of far-field transmission of airborne pathogens including SARS-CoV-2, which need to be considered in public health decision making.

Identifiers

PMID35291299
PMCPMC8923116
OpenAlexW4220911835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.