ReviewGlobal health & medicine2022
The current status of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan.
Review in Global health & medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of the vessel sealer in paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the robotic assisted approach in endometrial cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of da VinciMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes in endometrial cancer in Japan.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- How does robotic surgery affect gynecology patient care?Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Review
- Postoperative vision loss due to bilateral vitreous hemorrhage after robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2024Article
- Efficacy and prognosis of robotic surgery with sentinel node navigation surgery in endometrial cancer.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Article
- RoboticIn vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The da Vinci
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.