Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35291048›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2022

The impact of asynchronous online anatomy teaching and smaller learning groups in the anatomy laboratory on medical students' performance during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Ming-Fong Chang, Meng-Lin Liao, June-Horng Lue, Chi-Chuan Yeh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming-Fong ChangDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-7669
Meng-Lin LiaoDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-319X
June-Horng LueDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Chuan YehDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4455-8981
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of Education PMN1100547Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 110-2511-H-002-020-MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2511-H-002-020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, National Taiwan University anatomy teachers adopted asynchronous online video teaching and reduced the size of anatomy laboratory groups in April 2020. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of these changes on medical students' learning. Before Covid-19, the performance of the 2019-2020 cohort was significantly better than that of the 2018-2019 cohort. However, the implementation of modified teaching strategies significantly lowered the laboratory midterm score of the 2019-2020 cohort in the second semester. Conversely, the final laboratory examination score of the 2019-2020 cohort was significantly higher than that of the 2018-2019 cohort. Through correlation analysis, lecture and laboratory examination scores were highly correlated. Additionally, the difference in lecture and laboratory z-scores between two cohorts, the Likert scale survey and free-text feedback of the 2019-2020 cohort, were conducted to show the impact of modified teaching strategies. There were several important findings in this study. First, the change in teaching strategies may temporarily negatively influence medical students to learn anatomy. Besides, analyzing the performance of laboratory assessments could be a complementary strategy to evaluate online assessments. Applying lecture examination scores to predict laboratory performance was a feasible way to identify students who may have difficulty in learning practical dissection. Finally, reducing group size together with reduced peer discussion may have a negative effect on learning cadaver dissection for students with low academic performance. These findings should be taken into consideration when anatomy teachers apply new teaching strategies in anatomy courses.

Indexed as

AnatomyCOVID-19Students, MedicalCadaverEducational MeasurementHumansPandemicsTeachinganatomycadaveric dissectionCovid-19gross anatomy educationmedical educationstudents’ perceptionsTBLTeam-based learning

Identifiers

PMID35291048
PMCPMC9082485
OpenAlexW4220759061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.