Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35290856›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2022

Differential neural sensitivity to social inclusion and exclusion in adolescents in foster care.

Nandita Vijayakumar, Theresa W Cheng, Jessica E Flannery, John C Flournoy, Garrett Ross, Arian Mobasser, Zdena Op de Macks, Philip A Fisher, Jennifer H Pfeifer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nandita VijayakumarSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Australia; Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA. Electronic address: nandi.vijayakumar@deakin.edu.au.
Theresa W ChengDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Jessica E FlanneryDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
John C FlournoyDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA; Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA.
Garrett RossDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Florida, USA.
Arian MobasserDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Zdena Op de MacksDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Philip A FisherDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
Jennifer H PfeiferDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, USA.
University of Oregon · USDeakin University · AUHarvard University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Translational Drug Abuse Prevention CenterP50DA035763 · NIDA · OREGON SOCIAL LEARNING CENTER, INC. · PI CHAMBERLAIN, PATRICIA, FISHER, PHILIP A · 2013 to 2017
$9.5M
Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute TL1 ProgramTL1TR002371 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLISON Deborah FRYER, JESSINA C MCGREGOR · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
Puberty, neural systems for social processes, and early adolescent mental health: A longitudinal neuroimaging studyR01MH107418 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI PFEIFER, JENNIFER HOPE · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
Close friendship quality and the emergence of depression in adolescent females: Neurodevelopmental mechanisms and sensitive periodsF31MH124353 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CHENG, THERESA W · 2020 to 2021
$44k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR002371NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA035763NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH124353NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdolescents in foster care may exhibit differential patterns of brain functioning that contribute to their pervasive socioemotional challenges. However, there has been limited investigation of implicated neural processes, particularly in the social domain. Thus, the current study investigated neural responses to exclusionary and inclusionary peer interactions in adolescents in foster-care.

methodsParticipants comprised adolescents aged 11-18 years in foster care (N = 69) and a community sample (N = 69). They completed an fMRI adaptation of Cyberball, a virtual ball-throwing paradigm, that included periods of exclusion and over-inclusion. To investigate neural sensitivity to peer social experiences, we quantified neural responses that scaled with consecutive inclusionary and exclusionary interactions (using parametric modulators).

resultsRelative to the community sample, adolescents in foster care exhibited increasing response to consecutive exclusionary events in lateral prefrontal regions and decreasing response to consecutive inclusionary events in the intraparietal sulcus and temporo-occipital cortex. Further, exploratory analyses revealed that dorsolateral prefrontal activation to exclusion was related to externalizing problems, particularly in the foster care sample.

conclusionsFindings highlight greater neural sensitivity to exclusionary, and lesser sensitivity to inclusionary, peer interactions in adolescents in foster care. Engagement of prefrontal clusters may reflect greater salience and emotion regulatory processes during exclusion, while parietal and temporal clusters may reflect reduced attention and behavioural engagement during inclusion. Thus foster care involvement is associated with broad changes in neural responses during peer interactions, and further these potentially relate to externalizing problems that have been identified in this vulnerable population.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsSocial InclusionAdolescentBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPeer GroupAdolescenceCyberballfMRIFoster careSocial exclusionSocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID35290856
PMCPMC8921471
OpenAlexW4221101746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.