Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35290710›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2022

Determination of commissioning criteria for multileaf-collimator, stereotactic radiosurgery treatments on Varian TrueBeam and Edge machines using a novel anthropomorphic phantom.

Thomas A D Brown, Jessica M Fagerstrom, Caleb Beck, Connor Holloway, Krista Burton, Darryl G L Kaurin, Saikanth Mahendra, Marcus Luckstead, Kayla Kielar, James Kerns

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas A D BrownNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Jessica M FagerstromNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Caleb BeckNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Connor HollowayNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Krista BurtonNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Darryl G L KaurinNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Saikanth MahendraNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Marcus LucksteadNorthwest Medical Physics Center, Lynnwood, Washington, USA.
Kayla KielarVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
James KernsVarian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Varian Medical Systems (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An anthropomorphic phantom has been developed by Varian Medical Systems for commissioning multileaf-collimator (MLC), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) treatments on Varian TrueBeam and Edge linear accelerators. Northwest Medical Physics Center (NMPC) has collected end-to-end data on these machines, at six independent clinical sites, to establish baseline dosimetric and geometric commissioning criteria for SRS measurements with this phantom. The Varian phantom is designed to accommodate four interchangeable target cassettes, each designed for a specific quality assurance function. End-to-end measurements utilized the phantom to verify the coincidence of treatment isocenter with a hidden target in a Winston-Lutz cassette after localization using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Dose delivery to single target (2 cm) and single-isocenter, multitarget (2 and 1 cm) geometries was verified using ionization chamber and EBT3 film cassettes. A nominal dose of 16 Gy was prescribed for each plan using a site's standard beam geometry for SRS cases. Measurements were performed with three Millennium and three high-definition MLC machines at beam energies of 6-MV and 10-MV flattening-filter-free energies. Each clinical site followed a standardized procedure for phantom simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery. All treatment planning and delivery was performed using ARIA oncology information system and Eclipse treatment planning software. The isocenter measurements and irradiated film were analyzed using DoseLab quality assurance software; gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm, 3%/0.5 mm, and 2%/1 mm were applied for film analysis. Based on the data acquired in this work, the recommended commissioning criteria for end-to-end SRS measurements with the Varian phantom are as follows: coincidence of treatment isocenter and CBCT-aligned hidden target < 1 mm, agreement of measured chamber dose with calculated dose ≤ 5%, and film gamma passing > 90% for gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm after DoseLab auto-registration shifts ≤ 1 mm in any direction.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedHumansParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assistedcommissioningphantomstereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID35290710
PMCPMC9195028
OpenAlexW4221022572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.