Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35290601›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical science2022

Expert Consensus on Cognitive Dysfunction in Diabetes.

Yan Yang, Jia-Jun Zhao, Xue-Feng Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cranberry Extract Ameliorates Diabetic Cognitive Impairment in Rats Via LncRNA GAS-5 Downregulation and Pyroptosis Pathway Inhibition.Journal of neuroimmune pharmacology : the official journal of the Society on NeuroImmune Pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yan YangDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Jia-Jun ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, 25000, China. jjzhao@sdu.edu.cn.
Xue-Feng YuDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. xfyu188@163.com.
Tongji Hospital · CNShandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of diabetes is gradually increasing in China, and diabetes and associated complications, such as cognitive dysfunction have gained much attention in recent time. However, the concepts, clinical treatment, and prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients with diabetes remain unclear. The Chinese Society of Endocrinology investigated the current national and overseas situation of cognitive dysfunction associated with diabetes. Based on research both in China and other countries worldwide, the Expert Consensus on Cognitive Dysfunction in Diabetes was established to guide physicians in the comprehensive standardized management of cognitive dysfunction in diabetes and to improve clinical outcomes in Chinese patients. This consensus presents an overview, definition and classification, epidemiology and pathogenesis, risk factors, screening, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients with diabetes.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDiabetes MellitusHumansMass ScreeningRisk Factorsantidiabetic agentscognitive dysfunctiondiabetes

Identifiers

PMID35290601
OpenAlexW4221047846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.