ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2022
Impact of COVID 19 pandemic on patients requiring renal biopsy.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Essential role of kidney biopsy in diagnosing glomerular diseases amidst evolving biomarkers.World journal of nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe disruption of healthcare services in coronavirus disease (COVID)19 pandemic was widespread particularly due to lockdown curbs. This study was undertaken to see the effect of this pandemic on subjects requiring renal biopsy. MATERIALS AND
methodRenal biopsies performed during the COVID 19 pandemic between April 2020 and December 2020 (Group 1) were compared with those in pre-COVID period between June 2019 and February 2020 (Group 2). Indication of biopsies, syndromic diagnosis and all baseline laboratory characteristics were retrieved from the hospital records.
results130 and 191 patients were biopsied in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Patients in group 1 were younger compared with group 2 (32.55 ± 15.60 and 36.37 ± 16.96 years, respectively, p value 0.038). The mean serum creatinine value in group 1 was significantly higher than in group 2 (3.21 ± 2.08 and 2.68 ± 2.02 mg/dl respectively, p value: 0.023). Group 1 comprises a significantly higher percentage of rapidly progressive renal failure patients (RPRF) (39.3 vs 28, p value 0.046). A higher percentage of nephrotics was biopsied in group 2 vs group 1 (46.9 vs 30.4 respectively, p value 0.008). The treatment protocol remained similar in both the groups. Evaluation of the transplant biopsies revealed a nonsignificant higher number of rejections in group 1 (11 out of 18) as compared to group 2 (5 out of 16), p value 0.100. Combined rejection saw a lesser use of rATG in group 1.
conclusionCOVID pandemic induced restrictive measures could have led to selective high risk patients with RPRF as presumptive diagnosis and higher creatinine values getting biopsied. Higher rejections were noticed in transplant recipients pointing towards the need of establishing a more efficient support system for managing such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.