ArticleCurrent microbiology2022
Genetic Diversity and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Effects of Bacteria Isolated from Rhizospheric Soils.
Article in Current microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isolation, Identification, and Functional Characterization of a Rhizosphere Bacterium Promoting the Growth ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- PGPR-mediated enhancement of soil nutrients, rhizosphere microbial ecology, and plant growth: a review.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Review
- From Biocontrol to Synthesis: Innovative Progress ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bioactive Pigment Production by Stenotrophomonas rhizophila PB01: Partial Characterization and its Biological Applications.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Isolation and Characterisation of Bacteria From an Extremely High Boron and Salinity-Tolerant Puccinellia distans (Jacq.) Parl. Rhizosphere and Their Potential Impact on the Growth of Bread Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Environmental microbiology reports · 2025Article
- Whole-Genome Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Synergistic effect of grassland plants and beneficial rhizosphere bacteria helps plants cope with overgrazing stress.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Mechanistic understanding of metabolic cross-talk betweenFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Bambara Nut Root-Nodules Bacteria from a Semi-Arid Region of South Africa and Their Plant Growth-Promoting Traits.International journal of microbiology · 2023Article
- Genomic mechanisms of plant growth-promoting bacteria in the production of leguminous crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Review
- Idiomarina rhizosphaerae sp. nov. isolated from rhizosphere soil of Kalidium cuspidatum, and reclassification of Idiomarina andamanensis as Pseudidiomarina andamanensis comb. nov., and Idiomarina mangrovi as Pseudidiomarina mangrovi comb. nov.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Antagonistic and plant growth promotion of rhizobacteria againstFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have the potential to make a significant contribution to the development of sustainable agricultural systems. Generally, PGPRs function in three different ways, summarized as the synthesis of certain compounds for plants, facilitating the uptake of certain nutrients from the soil and protecting plants from diseases. This study aims to isolate plant growth-promoting bacteria from different plant rhizospheres from Ankara province, to reveal their genetic diversity, and to determine their plant growth-promoting properties. The identification of the 69 isolates was made according to the 16S rDNA sequence results and ARDRA analyses were also performed using AluI, HeaIII, and MspI enzymes. Nitrogen fixation, phosphate dissolving, IAA (indole-3-acetic acid) and siderophore production capacities of the 69 bacterial strains including 12 different genera (30 Pseudomonas, 13 Arthrobacter, 7 Bacillus, 4 Phyllobacter, 4 Variovorax, 3 Olivibacter, 3 Enterobacter, 2 Paenarthrobacter, 1 Stenotrophomonas, 1 Flavobacterium, 1 Caulobacter, 1 Paenibacillus) were evaluated in in vitro conditions. Nitrogen fixation capacities of 55 isolates varied between 2.29 and 46.11 µg mL
Indexed as
Identifiers
35290524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.