Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35290470›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2022

[Pathological processing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma-What is new?]

Johanna Munding, Andrea Tannapfel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johanna MundingInstitut für Pathologie, Georgius Agricola Stiftung Ruhr, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44879, Bochum, Deutschland. Johanna.Munding@rub.de.
Andrea TannapfelInstitut für Pathologie, Georgius Agricola Stiftung Ruhr, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44879, Bochum, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The macroscopic and microscopic assessments of pancreatic cancer resection specimens belong to the standard repertoire of any department of pathology. In recent years standards have been developed regarding both macroscopic and microscopic assessments, which are laid down in international and national guidelines and classifications and are regularly updated. In this way the reporting of results and interdisciplinary communication are facilitated. These classifications and guidelines are influenced by current studies and the data from them provide information on which histopathological factors are particularly relevant for the prognosis and treatment. Due to the increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy the assessment of tumor regression in histopathological specimens is also gaining in importance. Finally, individual targeted treatments are also now available for pancreatic cancer, which require extended molecular pathological diagnostics.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisHistopathological subtypesLymph node ratioMolecular pathological diagnosticsRegression gradingTNM classification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.