Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35290437›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology research2022

IDO Vaccine Ablates Immune-Suppressive Myeloid Populations and Enhances Antitumor Effects Independent of Tumor Cell IDO Status.

Rahul Nandre, Vivek Verma, Pankaj Gaur, Veerupaxagouda Patil, Xingdong Yang, Zainab Ramlaoui, Nour Shobaki, Mads Hald Andersen, Ayako Wakatsuki Pedersen, Mai-Britt Zocca and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Tumor microenvironment antigens.Seminars in immunopathology · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Rahul Nandre *The Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Vivek Verma *The Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-8129-4140
Pankaj GaurThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0002-9718-3565
Veerupaxagouda PatilThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-7040
Xingdong YangThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Zainab RamlaouiThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Nour ShobakiThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0001-9073-0987
Mads Hald AndersenIO Biotech ApS, København, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2914-9605
Ayako Wakatsuki PedersenIO Biotech ApS, København, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5968-3000
Mai-Britt ZoccaIO Biotech ApS, København, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-1553
Mikayel MkrtichyanThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
Seema GuptaThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0003-0106-595X
Samir N KhleifThe Center for Immunology and Immunotherapy, The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.ORCID 0000-0003-2707-5224
Georgetown University · USSDS Biotech (Japan) · JP

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
LSR-Fortessa upgrade for Shared ResourceS10OD016213 · OD · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI CRESWELL, KAREN A · 2013 to 2013
$298k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NIH HHS S10 OD016213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) does not allow generation and expansion of antitumor effector cells. One of the potent immunosuppressive factors present in the TME is the indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) enzyme, produced mainly by cancer cells and suppressive immune cells of myeloid origin. In fact, IDO+ myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and dendritic cells (DC) tend to be more suppressive than their IDO- counterparts. Hence, therapeutic approaches that would target the IDO+ cells in the TME, while sparing the antigen-presenting functions of IDO- myeloid populations, are needed. Using an IDO-specific peptide vaccine (IDO vaccine), we explored the possibility of generating effector cells against IDO and non-IDO tumor-derived antigens. For this, IDO-secreting (B16F10 melanoma) and non-IDO-secreting (TC-1) mouse tumor models were employed. We showed that the IDO vaccine significantly reduced tumor growth and enhanced survival of mice in both the tumor models, which associated with a robust induction of IDO-specific effector cells in the TME. The IDO vaccine significantly enhanced the antitumor efficacy of non-IDO tumor antigen-specific vaccines, leading to an increase in the number of total and antigen-specific activated CD8+ T cells (IFNγ+ and granzyme B+). Treatment with the IDO vaccine significantly reduced the numbers of IDO+ MDSCs and DCs, and immunosuppressive regulatory T cells in both tumor models, resulting in enhanced therapeutic ratios. Together, we showed that vaccination against IDO is a promising therapeutic option for both IDO-producing and non-IDO-producing tumors. The IDO vaccine selectively ablates the IDO+ compartment in the TME, leading to a significant enhancement of the immune responses against other tumor antigen-specific vaccines.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesMelanomaAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-DioxygenaseMiceTumor MicroenvironmentAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesIndoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase

Identifiers

PMID35290437
PMCPMC9381100
OpenAlexW4220928197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.