ArticleeLife2022
Corticofugal regulation of predictive coding.
Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rethinking hierarchy: the auditory system as an integrated cortical-subcortical network.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026Review
- A shared predictive architecture in the sensory cortex for statistical and reward-based learning.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2026Review
- Context-dependent effects of SOM neurons to enhance the responses of corticocollicular neurons to repetitive sounds.iScience · 2026Article
- The representation of omitted sounds in the mouse auditory cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Focal thalamic infrared neural stimulation propagates dynamical transformations in auditory cortex.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Location-specific neural facilitation in marmoset auditory cortex.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Direct Piriform-to-Auditory Cortical Projections Shape Auditory-Olfactory Integration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Distinct Neuron Types Contribute to Hybrid Auditory Spatial Coding.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Cell-type-specific enhancement of deviance detection by synaptic zinc in the mouse auditory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Direct piriform-to-auditory cortical projections shape auditory-olfactory integration.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Two Prediction Error Systems in the Nonlemniscal Inferior Colliculus: "Spectral" and "Nonspectral".The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Auditory Corticofugal Neurons Transmit Auditory and Non-auditory Information During Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Sequential maturation of stimulus-specific adaptation in the mouse lemniscal auditory system.Science advances · 2024Article
- Neuronal responses to omitted tones in the auditory brain: A neuronal correlate for predictive coding.Science advances · 2023Article
- Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- Distinct topographic organization and network activity patterns of corticocollicular neurons within layer 5 auditory cortex.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2023Article
- The nuclei of the lateral lemniscus: unexpected players in the descending auditory pathway.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory systems must account for both contextual factors and prior experience to adaptively engage with the dynamic external environment. In the central auditory system, neurons modulate their responses to sounds based on statistical context. These response modulations can be understood through a hierarchical predictive coding lens: responses to repeated stimuli are progressively decreased, in a process known as repetition suppression, whereas unexpected stimuli produce a prediction error signal. Prediction error incrementally increases along the auditory hierarchy from the inferior colliculus (IC) to the auditory cortex (AC), suggesting that these regions may engage in hierarchical predictive coding. A potential substrate for top-down predictive cues is the massive set of descending projections from the AC to subcortical structures, although the role of this system in predictive processing has never been directly assessed. We tested the effect of optogenetic inactivation of the auditory cortico-collicular feedback in awake mice on responses of IC neurons to stimuli designed to test prediction error and repetition suppression. Inactivation of the cortico-collicular pathway led to a decrease in prediction error in IC. Repetition suppression was unaffected by cortico-collicular inactivation, suggesting that this metric may reflect fatigue of bottom-up sensory inputs rather than predictive processing. We also discovered populations of IC units that exhibit repetition enhancement, a sequential increase in firing with stimulus repetition. Cortico-collicular inactivation led to a decrease in repetition enhancement in the central nucleus of IC, suggesting that it is a top-down phenomenon. Negative prediction error, a stronger response to a tone in a predictable rather than unpredictable sequence, was suppressed in shell IC units during cortico-collicular inactivation. These changes in predictive coding metrics arose from bidirectional modulations in the response to the standard and deviant contexts, such that the units in IC responded more similarly to each context in the absence of cortical input. We also investigated how these metrics compare between the anesthetized and awake states by recording from the same units under both conditions. We found that metrics of predictive coding and deviance detection differ depending on the anesthetic state of the animal, with negative prediction error emerging in the central IC and repetition enhancement and prediction error being more prevalent in the absence of anesthesia. Overall, our results demonstrate that the AC provides cues about the statistical context of sound to subcortical brain regions via direct feedback, regulating processing of both prediction and repetition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.