ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022
Half-life and initial Solar System abundance of
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Recent progress and future prospects of the early solar system chronology.National science review · 2025Review
- Article
- The initial solar system abundance ofScience advances · 2025Article
- Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Time Constraints from Small Bodies and the Lifetime of Reservoirs in the Solar Protoplanetary Disk.Space science reviews · 2025Review
- TheScientific reports · 2024Article
- A 4,565-My-old record of the solar nebula field.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Igneous meteorites suggest Aluminium-26 heterogeneity in the early Solar Nebula.Nature communications · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The formation and differentiation of planetary bodies are dated using radioactive decay systems, including the short-lived 146Sm-142Nd (T½ = 103 or 68 Ma) and long-lived 147Sm-143Nd (T½ = 106 Ga) radiogenic pairs that provide relative and absolute ages, respectively. However, the initial abundance and half-life of the extinct radioactive isotope 146Sm are still debated, weakening the interpretation of 146Sm-142Nd systematics obtained for early planetary processes. Here, we apply the short-lived 26Al-26Mg, 146Sm-142Nd, and long-lived 147Sm-143Sm chronometers to the oldest known andesitic meteorite, Erg Chech 002 (EC 002), to constrain the Solar System initial abundance of 146Sm. The 26Al-26Mg mineral isochron of EC 002 provides a tightly constrained initial δ26Mg* of −0.009 ± 0.005 ‰ and (26Al/27Al)0 of (8.89 ± 0.09) × 10−6. This initial abundance of 26Al is the highest measured so far in an achondrite and corresponds to a crystallization age of 1.80 ± 0.01 Myr after Solar System formation. The 146Sm-142Nd mineral isochron returns an initial 146Sm/144Sm ratio of 0.00830 ± 0.00032. By combining the Al-Mg crystallization age and initial 146Sm/144Sm ratio of EC 002 with values for refractory inclusions, achondrites, and lunar samples, the best-fit half-life for 146Sm is 102 ± 9 Ma, corresponding to the physically measured value of 103 ± 5 Myr, rather than the latest and lower revised value of 68 ± 7 Ma. Using a half-life of 103 Ma for 146Sm, the 146Sm/144Sm abundance of EC 002 translates into an initial Solar System 146Sm/144Sm ratio of 0.00840 ± 0.00032, which represents the most reliable and precise estimate to date and makes EC 002 an ideal anchor for the 146Sm-142Nd clock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.