ArticleJAMA network open2022
Cancer Drug Approvals That Displaced Existing Standard-of-Care Therapies, 2016-2021.
Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning-assisted identification and validation of NRP1 inhibitors through molecular docking and dynamics simulations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Characteristics of clinical trials associated with appeal and return on investment to participants: a review and framework.The oncologist · 2025Review
- Trend and Provider- and Organizational-Level Factors Associated With Early Palliative Care Billing Among Patients Diagnosed With Distant-Stage Cancers in 2010-2019 in the United States.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025Article
- Subsequent Indications in Oncology Drugs: Pathways, Timelines, and the Inflation Reduction Act.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Quantitative Systems Pharmacology Modeling in Immuno-Oncology: Hypothesis Testing, Dose Optimization, and Efficacy Prediction.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2025Review
- Sotorasib for the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Novel Systemic Anticancer Therapy and Healthcare Utilization at the End of Life: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Financial Distress in Genitourinary Cancer: Insights From CDC National Health Interview Survey.JCO oncology practice · 2024Article
- Review
- Leveraging Cancer Phenotypic Plasticity for Novel Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Cost effectiveness of immunotherapy combination therapies for endometrial cancer.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2024Article
- Characterization and Survival Benefit of Drug Approvals for Metastatic Prostate Cancer, 2004 to 2022.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2024Article
- Use of suboptimal control arms in randomized clinical trials of investigational cancer drugs in China, 2016-2021: An observational study.PLoS medicine · 2023Observational
- Sonosensitive Cavitation Nuclei-A Customisable Platform Technology for Enhanced Therapeutic Delivery.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Targeting pan-essential pathways in cancer with cytotoxic chemotherapy: challenges and opportunities.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2023Review
- Reduced Risk of All-Cause, Cancer-, and Cardiovascular Disease-Related Mortality among Patients with Primary Malignant Cardiac Tumors Receiving Chemotherapy in the United States.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Article
- Patient preferences in the treatment of genitourinary cancers.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Article
- Therapeutic value of first versus supplemental indications of drugs in US and Europe (2011-20): retrospective cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Article
- Development and Characterization of Folic Acid-Conjugated Amodiaquine-Loaded Nanoparticles-Efficacy in Cancer Treatment.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- FDA-approved drugs in 2022: A brief outline.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Although several cancer drugs receive US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval each month, it is unclear how many of these cancer drugs transform the treatment landscape significantly by tumor group. Specifically, it remains unclear how many of these newly approved cancer drugs displace the existing standard-of-care therapies for their indication vs being added to existing therapies. Objective: To examine how many cancer drugs displace the standard-of-care therapies vs being added to existing therapy or filling breaks in systemic treatments in the metastatic setting, adjuvant setting, or maintenance setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study using landmark trials leading to FDA approval of cancer drugs between May 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021. The study evaluated all FDA approvals for cancer drugs between May 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021, using the FDA Oncology (Cancer)/Hematologic Malignancies Approval Notifications website. All clinical trials leading to FDA approval of cancer drugs during this period were examined. Main Outcomes and Measures: A drug was determined to have displaced the prior standard-of-care therapy by evaluating the comparator arm (or lack thereof) in the clinical trial leading to the drug's approval and also by reviewing National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines. Cancer drug approvals were categorized as first-line displacing if a drug was approved for use in the first-line setting and displaced the prior standard-of-care drug for an indication, first-line drug alternatives/new if a drug was approved for use in the first-line setting but did not displace the standard of care at the time of approval or was a new drug that was first of its class for an approved indication, add on if a drug was approved in combination with a previously approved therapy for a disease or if a drug was approved for use in the adjuvant or maintenance settings, and later line if a drug was approved for use in the second-, third-, or later-line settings. Results: Between May 1, 2016, and May 31, 2021, there were 207 FDA cancer drug approvals in oncology and malignant hematology. Of these 207 approvals, 28 drugs (14%) were first-line displacing therapies. A total of 32 drugs (15%) were first-line drug alternatives/new drugs. A total of 61 drugs (29%) were add-on therapies. Finally, 86 drugs (42%) were approved as later-line therapies. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, most cancer drug approvals between 2016 and 2021 were in the later-line settings as opposed to displacing the current standard-of-care therapy for the approved indication. These later-line drugs may benefit patients with few alternatives but add to the cost of care because competition in the drug markets is a key factor in leading to lower drug prices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.