ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Optical Evaluation of Intracorneal Ring Segment Surgery in Keratoconus.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual outcomes following implantation of intracorneal rings with sharp and round triangular cross-section designs in keratoconus.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Clinical and Tomographic Outcomes of Long Arc-Length Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Central Keratoconus.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Challenges in Biometry and Intraocular Lens Power Calculations in Keratoconus: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Intracorneal ring segment implantation for eyes with keratoconus and corneas thinner than 400 microns.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025Article
- Intracorneal Ring Segments in Keratoconus: A Narrative Literature Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Clinical outcomes of two symmetrical Kera-rings implanted in grade three keratoconus: a retrospective nonrandomized study.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of design parameters on the outcome of intrastromal ring surgery using biomechanical simulations.PloS one · 2024Article
- Double intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation: a new approach for improved clinical outcomes in keratoconus patients.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Asymmetric Intracorneal Ring Segments for the Management of Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of different intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) combinations on corneal morphology and visual performance on patients with keratoconus. Methods: A total of 124 eyes from 96 patients who underwent ICRS surgery were analyzed and classified into 7 groups based on ICRS disposition and the diameter of the surgical zone (5- and 6-mm). Pre- and postoperative complete ophthalmological examinations were conducted. Corneal geometry, volume, and symmetry were studied. Zernike polynomials were used to build a virtual ray-tracing model to evaluate optical aberrations and the Visual Strehl (VS). Results: ICRS induced significant flattening across the cornea, being more pronounced on the anterior (+0.38 mm, P < 0.001) than on the posterior (+0.15 mm, P < 0.001) corneal radius. Asphericity experienced a larger change for a 6-mm surgical zone diameter (from -1.23 ± 1.1 to -1.86 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) than for a 5-mm zone (from -1.99 ± 1.1 to -2.10 ± 1.5, P = 0.536). Mean astigmatism was reduced by 2.05 D (P < 0.001). Combination four was the most effective in reducing astigmatism. Coma decreased by 30% on average and combination one produced an average reduction by 51% (P < 0.05). Patients experienced significant improvement in visual performance, best corrected visual acuity increased from 0.57 ± 0.21 to 0.69 ± 0.21 and VS changed from 0.049 ± 0.02 to 0.065 ± 0.041. Conclusions: ICRS combinations implanted within 5 mm diameter zone are more effective in flattening the cornea, whereas those implanted on 6 mm diameter are as effective in reducing astigmatism and are a good choice if the asymmetry and the intended flattening are smaller. Combinations with asymmetrical implants are the best option to regularize corneal surface. Translational Relevance: This study uses methods and metrics of optical research applied to daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.