Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35289835›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Optical Evaluation of Intracorneal Ring Segment Surgery in Keratoconus.

Nicolas Alejandre, Pablo Pérez-Merino, Gonzalo Velarde, Ignacio Jiménez-Alfaro, Susana Marcos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Intracorneal ring segment implantation for eyes with keratoconus and corneas thinner than 400 microns.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas AlejandreOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Pérez-MerinoCentre for Microsystems Technology (CMST), Ghent University and Imec, Technologiepark, Ghent, Belgium.
Gonzalo VelardeOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ignacio Jiménez-AlfaroOphthalmology Department, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Susana MarcosInstituto de Óptica "Daza de Valdés", Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESGhent University · BEInstituto de Óptica "Daza de Valdés" · ES

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MICHELE RUCCI · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of different intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) combinations on corneal morphology and visual performance on patients with keratoconus. Methods: A total of 124 eyes from 96 patients who underwent ICRS surgery were analyzed and classified into 7 groups based on ICRS disposition and the diameter of the surgical zone (5- and 6-mm). Pre- and postoperative complete ophthalmological examinations were conducted. Corneal geometry, volume, and symmetry were studied. Zernike polynomials were used to build a virtual ray-tracing model to evaluate optical aberrations and the Visual Strehl (VS). Results: ICRS induced significant flattening across the cornea, being more pronounced on the anterior (+0.38 mm, P < 0.001) than on the posterior (+0.15 mm, P < 0.001) corneal radius. Asphericity experienced a larger change for a 6-mm surgical zone diameter (from -1.23 ± 1.1 to -1.86 ± 1.2, P < 0.001) than for a 5-mm zone (from -1.99 ± 1.1 to -2.10 ± 1.5, P = 0.536). Mean astigmatism was reduced by 2.05 D (P < 0.001). Combination four was the most effective in reducing astigmatism. Coma decreased by 30% on average and combination one produced an average reduction by 51% (P < 0.05). Patients experienced significant improvement in visual performance, best corrected visual acuity increased from 0.57 ± 0.21 to 0.69 ± 0.21 and VS changed from 0.049 ± 0.02 to 0.065 ± 0.041. Conclusions: ICRS combinations implanted within 5 mm diameter zone are more effective in flattening the cornea, whereas those implanted on 6 mm diameter are as effective in reducing astigmatism and are a good choice if the asymmetry and the intended flattening are smaller. Combinations with asymmetrical implants are the best option to regularize corneal surface. Translational Relevance: This study uses methods and metrics of optical research applied to daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

AstigmatismKeratoconusCorneal StromaCorneal TopographyEye, ArtificialHumansProsthesis ImplantationRefraction, OcularVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID35289835
PMCPMC8934543
OpenAlexW4221046678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.