Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35289434›Full record

ReviewJournal of internal medicine2022

Advances in the Omicron variant development.

Antonio Vitiello, Francesco Ferrara, Amogh M Auti, Marina Di Domenico, Mariarosaria Boccellino

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 172 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. SARS-CoV-2-neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID-19.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonio VitielloPharmaceutical Department, Usl Umbria 1, Perugia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-166X
Francesco FerraraPharmaceutical Department, Asl Napoli 3 Sud, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9298-6783
Amogh M AutiDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Marina Di DomenicoDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-4200
Mariarosaria BoccellinoDepartment of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-010X
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITRegione Campania · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 has spread worldwide, leading the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare a pandemic, on 11 March 2020. Variants of concern have appeared at regular intervals-Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and now Omicron. Omicron variant, first identified in Botswana in November 2021, is rapidly becoming the dominant circulating variant. In this review, we provide an overview regarding the molecular profile of the Omicron variant, epidemiology, transmissibility, the impact on vaccines, as well as vaccine escape, and finally, we report the pharmacological agents able to block the endocellular entry of SARS-CoV-2 or to inhibit its viral replication. The Omicron has more than 50 mutations, of which the spike protein has 26-35 amino acids different from the original SARS-CoV-2 virus or the Delta, some of which are associated with humoral immune escape potential and greater transmissibility. Omicron has a significant growth advantage over Delta, leading to rapid spread with higher incidence levels. The disease so far has been mild compared to the Delta. The two vaccination doses offer little or no protection against Omicron infection while the booster doses provide significant protection against mild illness and likely offer even greater levels of protection against serious illness. Recently, new oral antiviral agents such as molnupiravir and paxlovid have been approved and represent important therapeutic alternatives to antiviral remdesivir. In addition, monoclonal antibodies such as casirivimab/imdevimab bind different epitopes of the spike protein receptor; is this class of drugs effective against the Omicron variant? However, more research is needed to define whether Omicron is indeed more infectious and whether the vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and antivirals currently available are effective.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsHumansSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentscasirivimabimdevimabSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antiviral drugsCOVID-19epidemiologymonoclonal antibodiesmutationspandemicSARS-CoV-2spike proteinvaccineVOC

Identifiers

PMID35289434
PMCPMC9115048
OpenAlexW4221073688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.