Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35289115›Full record

ArticleAutism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research2022

Autism and the criminal justice system: An analysis of 93 cases.

Rachel Slavny-Cross, Carrie Allison, Sarah Griffiths, Simon Baron-Cohen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of autism spectrum disorder inside prison.Revista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characteristics of harmful sexual behaviour in autistic adolescent males as compared to controls.Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Are autistic people disadvantaged by the criminal justice system? A case comparison.Autism : the international journal of research and practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Autism and the criminal justice system: An analysis of 93 cases.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel Slavny-CrossAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4648-6619
Carrie AllisonAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-2090
Sarah GriffithsAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0720-4511
Simon Baron-CohenAutism Research Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-2544
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 214322\Z\18\Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigate whether autistic people's vulnerability is taken into account at each stage of the criminal justice system (CJS). Defense lawyers from 12 nations were included in the study although the sample was predominantly from the UK. Lawyers completed an online survey regarding one case in which they had defended an autistic client between January 2015 and January 2020; and on one case in which they had defended a nonautistic client charged with a similar offense, to provide a comparison group. Ninety-three lawyers (85% in the UK) reported on one autistic case, and 53 also reported on one nonautistic case. 75% of autistic clients were not given reasonable adjustments during the process. Only 43% were offered an appropriate adult during police investigations, even though they had an existing diagnosis of autism. 59% of prosecution barristers and 46% of judges said or did something during the trial that made the lawyers concerned that they did not have an adequate understanding of autism. Lawyers were 7.58 times more likely to be concerned about their autistic client's effective participation in court and were 3.83 times more likely to be concerned that their autistic clients would engage in self-harm, compared with their nonautistic clients. There is a failure to identify and address autistic peoples' disability within the CJS. There is a need for mandatory autism training for police officers and the judiciary, with a focus on identifying autism and understanding the needs of autistic people so that reasonable adjustments are offered in all cases. LAY SUMMARY: This study sought to investigate if the needs of autistic people are being overlooked by the police and other professionals within the CJS. Results show that autistic people are not always given the support they need during police questioning or in court. The experience of being involved with the police may also have a more negative impact on autistic peoples' mental health than that of nonautistic people.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderAdultCriminal LawHumansPoliceSurveys and Questionnairesautismcriminal justicemitigationoffendingreasonable adjustments

Identifiers

PMID35289115
PMCPMC9314022
OpenAlexW4220738934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.