ArticleLa Tunisie medicale
The contribution of simulation in training for funduscopic examination.
Article in La Tunisie medicale. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Simulation models in direct ophthalmoscopy education: a systematic review.Canadian medical education journal · 2025Pooled it
- Is critical thinking potential correlated to critical appraisal skills of medical literature?La Tunisie medicale · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSimulation is emerging as an essential part of health sciences training programs as it provides safer patient care by reducing the risk of error. In the healthcare environment, simulation continues to spread in emergency specialties, but it is still underdeveloped in ophthalmology and there is a shortage of publications on this subject in Tunisia.
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of procedural simulation as a teaching tool for funduscopic examination training. Methods and population studied: This was a prospective study including students who underwent procedural simulation training sessions during their ophthalmology internship. The included students were assessed at the initiation and end of each session by a pre-test and post-test. The procedure for performing the funduscopic examination was evaluated by a specific performance score. Student satisfaction was assessed at the end of each session.
resultsDuring the study period, four groups of 12 students were included, for a total of 48 participants spread over 4 simulation sessions. Simulation training improved post-test. assessment scores with an overall median delta of +4.00. It also provided specific skills for performing the funduscopic examination, with an overall median specific performance score of 5.5/8 (5/8 to 7/8). The majority of students were satisfied upon completion of the simulation session.
conclusionThe training of fundus examination using an ophthalmoscopic simulator can improve the skills and knowledge of ophthalmic learners. This type of training can be an innovative addition to traditional learning.
methods
Indexed as
Identifiers
35288920PMC8974430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.