ArticleNeurocritical care2022
Predicting Early Seizures After Intracerebral Hemorrhage with Machine Learning.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Seizure risk prediction models after intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Dynamics of early electroencephalographic patterns and epileptic seizures in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: A prospective controlled study.Epilepsia · 2026Trial
- Prophylactic Antiepileptic Drugs in Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Network Meta-Analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Prophylactic Antiseizure Medication in Patients with Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Observational
- Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
- Influencing factors and predictive model for in-hospital complications in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A single-center retrospective study.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Article
- AI and Neurology.Neurological research and practice · 2025Review
- Phenotypes of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage, Complications, and Outcomes.Neurocritical care · 2025Article
- Risk factors of posthemorrhagic seizure in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Anticoagulation management in intracerebral hemorrhage patients with deep vein thrombosis: insights from unsupervised machine learning and nomogram analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Can machine learning predict late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhages? Evidence from real-world data.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2024Article
- Machine learning for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in intensive care unit.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Seizure prediction in stroke survivors who experienced an infection at skilled nursing facilities-a machine learning approach.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Predicting the recurrence of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using a machine learning model.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Modified CAVE score for predicting late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- The progress in predictive modeling of post-stroke epilepsy.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeizures are a harmful complication of acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). "Early" seizures in the first week after ICH are a risk factor for deterioration, later seizures, and herniation. Ideally, seizure medications after ICH would only be administered to patients with a high likelihood to have seizures. We developed and validated machine learning (ML) models to predict early seizures after ICH.
methodsWe used two large datasets to train and then validate our models in an entirely independent test set. The first model ("CAV") predicted early seizures from a subset of variables of the CAVE score (a prediction rule for later seizures)-cortical hematoma location, age less than 65 years, and hematoma volume greater than 10 mL-whereas early seizure was the dependent variable. We attempted to improve on the "CAV" model by adding anticoagulant use, antiplatelet use, Glasgow Coma Scale, international normalized ratio, and systolic blood pressure ("CAV + "). For each model we used logistic regression, lasso regression, support vector machines, boosted trees (Xgboost), and random forest models. Final model performance was reported as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic models for the test data. The setting of the study was two large academic institutions: institution 1, 634 patients; institution 2, 230 patients. There were no interventions.
resultsEarly seizures were predicted across the ML models by the CAV score in test data, (AUC 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.82). The ML model that predicted early seizure better in the test data was Xgboost (AUC 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.87, p = 0.04) compared with the CAV model AUC.
conclusionsEarly seizures after ICH are predictable. Models using cortical hematoma location, age less than 65 years, and hematoma volume greater than 10 mL had a good accuracy rate, and performance improved with more independent variables. Additional methods to predict seizures could improve patient selection for monitoring and prophylactic seizure medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.