Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35288804›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2022

Consideration of Fractional Distribution Parameter f

Yoo-Seong Jeong, William J Jusko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of small molecules: How much progress have we made?Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoo-Seong JeongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, 404 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA.
William J JuskoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, 404 Pharmacy Building, Buffalo, NY, 14214-8033, USA. wjjusko@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4027-0550

Funding

Mechanistic Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsR35GM131800 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI JUSKO, WILLIAM J. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM131800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient (K

methodsRelevant PBPK equations for non-eliminating and eliminating organs along with lung and liver were derived for the conversion of C

resultsUtilizing f

conclusionSince many different types/sources of K

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPlasmaAnimalsLiverRatsTissue Distributionpermeability coefficientPhysiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modelingtissue distribution ratetissue-to-plasma partition coefficient

Identifiers

PMID35288804
PMCPMC9014445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.