ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2023
[Does reduction mammoplasty improve neck pain and quality of life?]
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Influence of macromastia on cervical spine and thoracic spine].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- NLR and BMI are independent predictors of postoperative drainage volume in macromastia patients following reduction mammoplasty.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
objectiveMacromastia often leads to physical complaints involving pain in the shoulder/neck area. In Germany, there are virtually no reliable data on the effects of breast reduction surgery with regard to neck and spine complaints. Therefore, the authors carried out a retrospective study to investigate the effect of breast-reducing surgery on neck pain and quality of life.
methodsBetween January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019, 107 breast reductions were performed for macromastia. Medical records and OP reports were evaluated, and the indication for breast reduction documented. Pain was recorded preoperatively on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pretreatments and perioperative complications were also documented and evaluated. All patients were sent a questionnaire, which determined whether the objective of the operation had been achieved, how satisfied the patients were with the result of the operation, and how severe the current pain (VAS) was. The EQ-5D 3L health questionnaire was used to assess quality of life, and the Neck-Disability Index was used to assess neck complaints. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Wilcoxon test.
resultsAfter an average of 56.5 months (min: 18, max: 90), 76/107 (71%) patients could be re-examined. There were 15 complications. Pain improved from an average of 7.2 preoperatively (min: 0, max: 10) to an average of 1.6 postoperatively (min: 0, max: 4; p < 0.001). The Neck-Disability Index improved from an average of 43.8% (Min: 0, Max: 82) to an average of 10.8% (Min: 0, Max: 52) postoperatively (p < 0.001). In all, 71/76 (93%) of the examined patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the result of the operation. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionWith this study, the authors were able to show that there are often several reasons why breast reduction surgery is performed in patients with macromastia. A high patient satisfaction rate can be achieved and orthopedic clinical complaints associated with macromastia can be treated with a very high success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.